I mean the other day I played against a forum user that disconnected mid match because he thought I was cheating.
Out of every possible player, me lol
I mean the other day I played against a forum user that disconnected mid match because he thought I was cheating.
Out of every possible player, me lol
Hey now!
I resemble that remark!
(Iāve actually been in the PC lobby for a while now, way better to sharpen my skills).
Well shit my answer did ricochete somehow
Just vault. You are good.
Vault no. Peppega player
Actually a good suggestion
Way better than mine.
But in that case the limit will be 2 of the same squad
Iād have used the word āentitlementā, but yes.
Ye coldown on tanks and planes I kinda see and work with.
Even tho I can see this more a problem than a solution since neither tanks or planes are that hard to counter.
And, If I die on my bomber from a plane, I actually want to spawn my fighter to have a dogfight. Something that will be impossible after that.
Imo, just imo, problem isnāt the squads, nor vehicles nor weapons, but personal takes on how the game should be⦠And this aināt for you, but overall.
More than 2.
I want to have a right to take more than one full-engie or flamer squad.
What about my triple engineer squads meta?
This guy is on 2023. Already has the engineer 3 squad.
Unneeded restriction of gameplay.
Edit: Only in very rare situations i deploy more than one smg squad, but this is just how i like two play the game.
Premiums
OH mah God I didnāt even consider that.
Canāt remember last time I used one of them I even disregard them from consideration lol
Yep people do cycle 3 engineers squads with the current AA meta. Seeing it more recently
BRB gonna check my current lineups.
To fix something, playerbase has to abuse it. Itās probably the fastest way.
Balance aināt changing, but meta somehow changes anyway.
ONLY playing with one type of squad is not the problem here, the real problem is that āoftenā just one type of squad is the META.
Like if I play with a group of players, everyone in the team has a āsetā role that he is supposed to fulfill, thus one guy focuses on playing pioneer squads, one focuses on AT squad, and one is playing the best Infantry squad available ( which often is Assault squads )
What is the problem here? This is great gameplay, the only thing the game needs to get better at would be balancing āsniper, assault, MG, and Infantry squadsā and make them equally powerful.
As others have said, restrict taking more than 2. Hell let them take 3 assaulter squads (if they have more slots) but prevent them from cycling those 3 squads.
Well for a campaign like Tunisia you can just bring 2 assault squads and a bike squad then never use the bike squad. You effectively have the same thing as running 3 assault squads as you would just be cycling those 2 assault squads back to back.
No! I use specific squads on Berlin because I like the covered helmets on the Germans. They just so happen to be all assaulter squads. I donāt want to be forced into using squads with upgrades or looks that I simply donāt want to use.
Yeah, Its been a bad week for suggestions. Probably the worst I have seen here ever honestly.