I suppose I have enough of some pretenders of historical accuracy. But thx that was funny.
PPsh was in balance 2 years and now it starts to ruin game. Where do you been with high caliber Browning damage, accuracy guy? Thats funny.
I suppose I have enough of some pretenders of historical accuracy. But thx that was funny.
PPsh was in balance 2 years and now it starts to ruin game. Where do you been with high caliber Browning damage, accuracy guy? Thats funny.
Did you see me say “no, don’t fix it”?
If another gun is broken, it should be fixed as well, obviously.
Oh eah? Why you guys cry out entire red PPsh with only a 0.1 more damage. Dont tell me that silly stuff. Equal or being cut off. And thats your “logic” - not mine.
great, so there’s no issue at all if we make the ppsh 41 box have the same dispersion as the mp-41r, since in your own words people still erase teams with it
Oh eah? Why you guys cry out entire red PPsh with only a 0.1 more damage. Dont tell me that silly stuff. Equal or being cut off. And thats your “logic” - not mine.
I dont really recall ever speaking of red ppsh in any manner but what ever.
I aint see a 6.8 damage and 1250 rof + better recoil yet. Is it all will be given?
But some of you do and now it complitely cut off a game - now its only reskin.
Why people breaking mad about 0.1 more damage of PPS-43 and in other hand we have chill guy who talk - 0.2 more damage? Pffff thats not a problem.
There are very different approaches to the same question. And for some reason, one side has 0.1 more damage to remove and cut. The other 0.2 is fine.
Do you really think this is a fair approach?
I aint see a 6.8 damage and 1250 rof + better recoil yet. Is it all will be given?
probably not, but dodge some more and remember to mention KT2 as often as you can.
Also scoped stg because its very relevant to BR3 smg that functions like a assault rifle of BR5.
differency seems to be 0.099 seconds.
If that makes you happy then sure, doubt anyone even notices.
this is what you are whining about.
probably not, but dodge some more and remember to mention KT2 as often as you can.
Also scoped stg because its very relevant to BR3 smg that functions like a assault rifle of BR5.
Is that all you have to say? Should I take your statement about a scope at STG out of context and another about KT that I have not mentioned in this discussion? To be honest, I was expecting more. But okay.
Is that all you have to say? Should I take your statement about a scope at STG out of context and another about KT that I have not mentioned in this discussion? To be honest, I was expecting more. But okay.
this was the original question
Could you kindly now explain the logic behind these mental gymnastics ?
Like with what logic BR3 smg is comparable to BR5 assault rifle just because theres only 1 gun to choose from ?Really, do enlight me what actual fk is going on behind this statement.
Which remains un-answered.
But rather you have dodged the question with rather silly comparisons between TT gun to veterans box gun.
And since you apparently like to dodge I just kindly offered you some more stupid ways to dodge the question, aka KT2 or scoped STG that has absolutely nothing to do with subject.
And like I already said by all the fking means go for it no one notices the 0.099 second differency.
whining about.
At least I came across the fact that on one combat rating, at least three new good submachine guns were added to one side (I myself suggested lowered one of them according to the combat rating), and the other cut the characteristics of the only submachine gun in the entire rating, because it suddenly turned out that it had always been broken (surprise, surprise).
When I suggested bringing the characteristics of the only Soviet submachine gun to its Axis counterpart, I was told - well, it doesn’t matter, because the German PPSh is harder to get. And I don’t care that many people have it, I don’t care that it’s much stronger.
Well, what can I say, iron logic. Keep it up. I’m sure you will.
assault weapon with a scope in a soviet tech tree
Avs 36 sniper. Not excactly assaulter weapon but considering that america only has semi auto and japan bolt action it should be fine. Also soviets didnt even have scoped assault rifles anyway
because it suddenly turned out that it had always been broken (surprise, surprise).
Exactly, it always was broken.
Mp38 had similar dispersion 0.17 year ? 2 years ? ago.
And surprise surprise it was fixed in matter of weeks or months.
Yes, as you said ppsh box has always been broken.
Exactly, it always was broken.
Mp38 had similar dispersion 0.17 year ? 2 years ? ago.
And surprise surprise it was fixed in matter of weeks or months.Yes, as you said ppsh box has always been broken.
You mean this axis one? with higher damage, rof, less recoil. Indeed
This browning is broken and didn’t have amount of damage high calbr.
Same with the german mg 42 that overheats in 2 seconds. Apc weaponry suck for everyone not just soviets
Any paratrooper with flamethrowers?
Flamethrowers that have no fuel and are horribly inconsistent. Flamethrowers arent even meta since they have been nerfed multiple times. The folgore flametrowers are no good and standard assault loadout is better
You mean this axis one? with higher damage, rof, less recoil. Indeed
Mp38 ? Has higher recoil than ppsh box.
About twice less rof.
Try again.
Same with the german mg 42 that overheats in 2 seconds. Apc weaponry suck for everyone not just soviets
With a short burst from this MG-42, even with a little skill, I can shoot a lot. What swings the Browning on the M3 - it never works. White crosses are a real curse. Once again, this is a large-caliber weapon with twice as much damage - but no, it’s a weakened weapon in the game. On what grounds?
Man, seriusly - talk about how weak MG-42 with a shield - compare to a slow and pistol cliber Browning - thats fun
Mp38 ? Has higher recoil than ppsh box.
About twice less rof.Try again.
Try to look at resourse and use glasses. MP38 at br 2, Mp-41(r) at br 3.
Flamethrowers that have no fuel and are horribly inconsistent. Flamethrowers arent even meta since they have been nerfed multiple times. The folgore flametrowers are no good and standard assault loadout is better
Ok, this paras didnt good as you always say
Maybe soviets have 4 men flamethrowers as well as axis do?
With a short burst from this MG-42, even with a little skill, I can shoot a lot.
Same with m2. Sure it has pitiful damage for a hmg and i agree it should be buffed but the mg 42 aint any better.
Maybe soviets have 4 men flamethrowers as well as axis do?
As long as everyone gets paratroopers that can change their weapons like soviets do. I would rather be able to choose what i equip to my soldiers instead of having couple shitty flamethrowers