The Tah 183 can be added with that argument to have absolute dominance against the Allied Fighters.
It’s not a matter of if, just when
I believe eventually we will get the Me 262, IS 3, and even the Maus
I have one friendly objection, imagine me sitting in my tank, I spot this guy from 1 km away… Do you really think he will long enough to get in range?
what the meaning ? the result is the same with all AT but try to spot them while they are in building or someting to take cover is another story while you’re in a “box”
This Tomfoolery is as big the dude himself, it will be easier to spot than any other AT weapon.
But if it doesnt bother anyone else than fine by me, its better than copy-pasting.
this was already discussed. ww2 m20 had worse penetration than m9 bazooka. high penetration rocket was developed in 1948.
has 180mm penetration, which is inadequate for KT
best american alternative is m9 with high velocity rocket (t59) although it is prototype.
I would like to know the weights of this beast 
i’m agree with you but this depend a lots of the maps and the player if is smart enough to play sneaky etc depend of is balistic capability too. like who is even afraid of a tank when you have an AT launcher and you know that you pen in frontally
180 mm isn’t that bad why should we get the need to pen frontally a tank ? imagining they put the tortoise so what we need an AT launcher to pen him frontally aren’t we deleting the efectivness of the role from the tank ?
the man whose AT rocket is out of range, but in range for the tank´s weapons.
cause germans and soviets can pen tanks frontally with AT launchers.
sure for that, but those are pretty rare, don’t have so many long range fights. how many player come in front of you while they have the range for deleting you
soviet got panzerfaust for that without it’s a nop and i hate the mechanic about having lots of faust it’s a kind of nonsense how many is the pen for the last allied zooka ?
Now, technically, the tortoise was a post-war production vehicle. Granted, it doesn’t matter much since there’s already a few postwar things+the M26 T99 coming, but hey.
I believe that can pen the KT and even the Maus from the side. Now of coarse you will say “but the front” and that is a valid point but in this game I can not overstate the amount of vehicles I’ve seen directly on the frontline. It’s practically the standard. Usually they’re never too far out of reach. Plus all the other factors in game like guerillas, planes, new heavy AT guns, etc
1945 is the cut off date. It’s fine in my book. It was made for the war
they increased it from 101mm to 127mm which is still inadequate for KT.
m9 can penetrate KT from sides, while both shouldnt be able to do side of maus(HESH could probably pen rear)
it was just an example taking an ultra armored tank and getting rekt frontally by AT inf we don’t want moving coffin
yeah inadequate for the front but you can always flank if the meaning of taking the german at is to kill those spawn camper well it will more penalise the aggressive player that can’t rely on his front armor I would put a bonus or someting for the plane to eradicate his
ah… just flank it argument… 
Infantry have a much easier time flanking enemy vehicles than your team vehicles (obviously the size profile). In my experiences most vehicles tend to be touchable