M100 APFSDS as well, but loads honestly, especially when you get the more auxiliary components such as generators and that type of equipment
1 Like
ah what about M200? actually are there more than 200 M right now?
you know what i think US is too obsess with M.
This is half right. The Mauser cartridge is dimensionally identical to the Tokarev cartridge, but the Tokarev cartridge is a considerably hotter load. This means that one could use the Mauser cartridge in a weapon designed for the Tokarev, though probably with less recoil and a lower RoF.
Couple more than a mere 200
1 Like
Those one or two weapons become mainstays for the faction. I want the mainstay weapons of a faction to actually be from that faction.
1 Like
Anti-tank weapons are not what I think of as mainstays in any sense. They’re anti-tank weapons, they’re not a primary weapon, they’re not tanks, they’re not aircraft, they’re a secondary weapon that is used situationally by a specific class. And if the Panzerfaust was the main launcher used by the Soviets that would be 100% realistic. The Soviets never produced their own launchers in significant quantities, they only received 1,000 Piats from the British and 3,000 M1 Bazookas for the Americans, and they had thousands more of the Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck that they captured from German forces. There simply isn’t another historically accurate launcher launcher that the soviets could get that is on par with the Panzerfaust 100. The RPG-1 prototypes were not even as good as the Panzerfaust 60, let alone the 100. And for the Allies they can always add the M20 later on after the Panzerschreck that they’re adding this update. The M20 is honestly good enough to be the first BR5 anti-tank launcher, since it can penetrate 280mm armor and has a velocity of 103 m/s, and it entered production in 1944 so even though it didn’t see service, it would still be a good addition.