Discussion About Captured Weapons

Mess Room
21

Are those needed for balance?

22

I prefer the second, which is why the PanzerfÀust for the Soviets is great. Panzerschreck for the allies is not great, just add the M20. Even a PanzerfÀust for the allies would make more sense than the Panzerschreck

23

image
image1200×645 204 KB

So Soviet Maus when?

24

Yes, German and Soviet Mauses? Mise? What’s the plural of Maus?

25

I would love sawn off M1 carbines for Japan

26

we could use the svt 38 to get semi auto with mag
or IL-2 to get a versatile attackers

27

russian have some at launcher too
like the rpg 1 or brpg-44

28

Those were only ever prototypes and they’re worse than the PanzerfĂ€ust 60. The design was never even finalized, they kept updating it until 1948. It’s not a suitable replacement for the PanzerfĂ€ust 100.

29

i disagree rpg 1 was adopted in 46’s wich have 150 mm pen
while brpg 44 is an copy of panzerfaust but russian made

30

150mm is less than the PanzerfĂ€ust has, they even determined that in practice it wouldn’t be enough to go through the front of a Panther. BRPGis good though, just rename the PanzerfĂ€ust

31

rpg 1 could replace the 60 while BRPG the 100. I feel less problematic that URSS has panzerfaust than USA get rpzb if really they should get panzerfaust too

1 Like
32

Hard disagree. I will always prefer captured weapons if they are historically accurate and were captured in vast numbers, as opposed to paper prototypes. Y’all act like one or two captured launchers when there are 50 other non-captured weapons somehow ruin the tech tree.

1 Like
33

but for my part panzerfaust should be rework being able to transport 4 faust by soldier is way too much

1 Like
34

i’m agree even if we could add them as why not event, like the luftfaust

1 Like
35

That much is true yeah. Each soldier should only be able to have a max of 2. This would also balance them better with reusable launchers by having that as a tradeoff

For event weapons hell yes. I would also love the PanzerfÀust 150 for the Germans as their own launcher that nobody has captured.

1 Like
36

As you mentioned it should only be LIMITED TO 2 AND NO MORE Each Faction must have its Strengths and Weaknesses,I also mention what benefit captured weapons would give to Germany this apart from the MP-717 Even Germany should have its Finnish counterpart (Suomi KP-31)In the TT where would I leave this question? What does Germany gain from this? Why do I only see Allies and Soviets with Benefits for Obtaining an AT Weapon High penetration to destroy tanks and received by Germany That I can actually use?Why if you put the Suomi KP-31 or the Cönders make the Subf obsolete What are you thinking of mentioning to me, friend

2 Likes
37

This weapon was used exclusively by Germany, being the only AT weapon not used by the Soviets. , So I would like it to be Exclusive to GERMANY only and be used only by this Fraction and not by the other Factions that should Learning to face your weaknesses

2 Likes
38

Lol

M3 Halftrack

39

ngl i havent search up how many M’s US have in their military but i havent seen M100 yet at least

40

M103 Heavy Tank
M110 Howitzer
M110 Sniper Rifle
M163 VADS (Vulcan Air Defense System)
Etc

1 Like