I was refering RMN 50 as comparison …
that’s a damn arguments saying as long as I don’t face it it’s fine
The RMN-50 is a poor and disingenuous argument. The RMN-50 is a “handheld mortar,” meanwhile the M18 is a recoilless rifle. Different systems, different weapons, different uses, different effectiveness. They are in no way the same. Period. One fires mortar shells, the other fires a type of artillery shell. It is stupid to compare them at all. Not to mention the M18 was developed and send late into the war, but became a mainstay immediately. The RMN-50 is just a bunch of random damaged Mosin’s they slapped the barrel of a mortar onto
2 Likes
i’m agree for that but i was talking about his use in game you got the choice to get the HEAT round wich is bad versus tank with only 76 pen so not desirable. he was use a lot as infantry cleaner with his HE shell.
We have already seen how powerfull are RMN-50 and we already have some grenade rifle spam
Adding a TT M18 wich is more powerfull than an limited event RMN i’m not sure it’s a good idea you see
to be honest with the Super Pershing maybe US don’t need more anti tank weapons
Well the Bazooka’s don’t do anti infantry very well, so I want a recoilless that can
1 Like
While a fair point, have you considered how cool recoilless rifles are?
2 Likes
So it would take the Slots of an AT lanchers ?
single tank that get instantly marked and bombed cannot replace a rat AT team camping just around the corner completely hidden from the enemy
yeah we can add some American and British stuff just enough with the German stuff in the US and USSR tech tree
Well I don’t know that’s not the American way :
Nothing can give you more satisfaction then nuking a tank out of existence with rockets xD
1 Like
Don’t see why not
1 Like
Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Iraq and all of central America applaud you 
I’ll admit, our relationship with the Philippines hasn’t been the best for them. However thanks to Chinese aggression we seem to be getting closer once again! Cuba is just funny to mention. Puerto Rico has been trying to become a state for however long. Hawaii is a state. Iraq is Bush’s problem. Central America is just one giant cartel breeding ground so who cares what they think when a significant chunk of the drugs in the US is directly from them trafficking it up into us
USA has occupied or taken them over as an imperial power screwing them over in the process, including Hawaii deposing the ruling sovereign monarch for purely commercial motives. Bush was President and so is your country’s fault and you dont’ get to separate yourselves from him! 
So basically you guys are/have been just as much a-holes in that respect as any of the “traditional” Empires.
as opposed to china who we as invited to stay in tibet for a weekend in 1959 and stayed
The hero we need and deserve
GOD SAVE THE KING 
idk why i have a feeling that this topic might be purged
purged means removed not closed, i dont think i have seen them remove a thread?
The Hawaiian Kingdom was offered to keep their sovereignty and return government power back to them, which was supported by Grover Cleveland himself. Queen Liliuokalani still refused because she wanted to execute or banish the leaders of the Dole government.
She deposed her monarchy herself when she didn’t agree to the terms.
stupid retards can’t behave by discussing politics in an anti tank thread, might as well close it mods
2 Likes