Nah, matchmakers sucks.
worse than maps and modes is people not playing the objective. having five defense and loosing the first two in two or three minutes. sorry but i dont want to play a ten minute game because my team is not playing the game. spawning on the map to see only a single other infantry squad on the map. worse yet seeing the entire map with friendly units with not a single one on point. watching the enemy then take the point/objective. having to sacrifice kills and common sense to rush the point to prevent it from being taken.
It does seem like after the last update that German teams became less populated.
No one wants to play a match where they are expected to build all the rallies, bring the only APC, take down enemy tanks, kill all the planes bombing everything, try to prevent the enemy from planting the bomb, and disarm the bomb while also trying to kill all the enemies trying to mag dump you as you try to disarm the bombâŚ
Because everyone else expect maybe one guy is off still near spawn.
Looking at stuff I can guess why. Itâs one thing to just say
âAhahah wheraboos! Coooope!â
But what if a part of what they say wasnât entirely false?
Idk. I DO feel itâs very cringe to see just one faction receiving boosts and never nerfs all the time. Maybe the axis pop got tired of it and wanted to enjoy easy mode or joined Japan or Allies as a result.
Iâm no statistician. Itâs just what I see and seen since Enlisted, is.
But it doesnât matter, facts are here, axis blokes are not sticking around. UNLESS fighting allies. Go figure.
I guess we will have to wait and see what happens once Manchuria is here. Will the devs pull some crazy shenanigans in order to buff the Soviets against Japan because Japanese teams go pretty crazy? If so then yeah its pretty much clear that Soviet bias is a thing.
I donât think Soviets will receive even MORE buffs as I cannot see what else can be buffed.
But the red forum will ask for Japan nerf.
Or maybe a stronger SF rifle because âitâs not fairâ.
Eheh.
I wish for preferencial maps. Along preferencial modes.
They are gonna give the soviets a lend lease Enola Gay (Joking obviously)
Kinda deaf for arguments ,. People do have their reasons if you like it or not,. I am an avid deserter, some men choose to game instead of being a lover of SM. No way in Hell i am gonna sit out a ride which leads to 10 minutes of pure stupidity. It happens 1 out of 20 games is a real game, a battle. I hardly had to desert last year so. Beneficial is unfair in your eyes only.
Call me a skeptic, but I will believe it when they actually produce it.
This, punishment isnât going to do anything, give the people incentives to stay, like choosing the maps and game mode, which I keep hear about, keep hearing is in the works but never see anything other then their discussing it, or itâs in the works. Whatâs the saying?
Sure!
Weâre going to punish the deserters because youâre upset.
Why donât you look at the reasons why people desert? Oh yes, itâs more difficult and complex.
So letâs punish deserters because you lost a game.
Deserters would be shot back in WWII⌠Just saying.
In WW2 you got paid you did not pay
Maybe increase the loot you get in the military rank system and increase the penalty you get on your military rank for leaving a match. Instead of the 1 point and the no bonus from joining any army for one game you end up losing 10 points and no more bonus from join any army until you win a game or after repeat offense of more than 3 desertions in a row that takes effect and it refreshes after 8 hours.
and soldiers wanted to relax after getting shot at, your point is?
The bonus increase is nice, but the escape penalty shouldnât be too heavy. I have crappy internet and sometimes the game kicks me out for no reason.
well deserting 3 times in a row is rare but maybe it can only be 5 points after the third offense and keep the -1 per desertion
Do you want to miss the point any further?
Deserters need to be punished. One way or another.
No, they dont.