Which can be seen is well reflected inside the game on the so called resource-“that’s not a resource but just a chart of letters and numbers” that I shared yesterday:
Edit: I selected the wrong bomb for the 500kg, my bad. Edit made 5m after posting.
I do wanna share for shits and gigs, the discovery of a mosquito fitted to carry a 4000lb blockbuster bomb which would be undeniably funny to use in game.
Well, yes, bigger bombs would more then likely weigh more, but in Enlisted, it could be an Atomic bomb and it still wouldn’t be able to penetrate a roof.
not sure here but what?
You realize the composition of something makes the weight and size yes?
something can be bigger but lighter.
In case of bombs, type of bomb, materials etc
So higer weight equals less tnt, less explosive effect yup all you had in physics.
Further on lets say its true,it can be couse its breaking physics rules,but lets say it has,that must mean that it has more fragmentation,couse if its not explosive in a bomb then its shrapnel.
I can copy you a link of an net page where its says am a bultimilioner ,it does not proove a thing.
I know this forum and game are full of yt history experts,but…game data can be one thing but they are way out of reallity.
Omg the soviets still have a panzerfist,its a strike for all history knowers.
Yes,please forward this to somebody higher on the letter,who will understand 4 grade physics.
I have never seen a lighter bomb carry more explosive and shrapnel then the heavier one,what they put inside soft teddybears ,like where do you ppl get your thinking,you dont?
Or you are all cleary on bias team,couse its your side you play
At least now you understand that 1000lb is lighter then 500kg,we go one thing at the time