OK I edited it
sorry for that
Which is my second biggesrt concerns about merging theatres together (apart from Dfs conservatism).
People sometimes propoes merging SG and Moscow together but I can already see issues with the KV, PPS or lad-leased stuff which wasnt in Moscow/ Winter 1941/42.
That is true,But it could work somehow this would probably be a huge project but im not sure how they would realese it remember this DOES NOT need to be in game, Like I said, it`s a idea
the only problem i could see is the chinese civil war was happening at that time both side where ally powers so some would be USA weapons or russian
which adds the problem of ether two campands for north and south or gaijin getting political favoriting Taiwan or the ccp over the other
I say no to any new campaigns. The playerbase is split up enough as it is
Heres the thing dude you need as much content in enlisted as possible why have a ww2 game without completeing the ww2?
what??
He has a point.
While I dont think we suffer from lack of players, the players stick to one or two campaigns which are Normandy and Berlin (depending on the new levels).
Ya, release new content to attract players but donât bring in content that divides the playerbase. Thatâs fueling what is killing this game
What ?
Iâm sure the Sino Japanese campaign is cross era, because no one has done it before.
It will undoubtedly attract a large number of players in Asia
I doubt that but hereâs to hoping
Absolutely necessary, and I also wanna point out that China has allowed several movies to be produced on state media in recent years that feature not only nationalist troops, but even the flag. In the recent movie 800, they allowed a long dramatic scene to be filmed of nationalist soldiers protecting the ROC flag. If theyâre letting that stuff get produced in movies, theyâre not gonna censor depictions in a free-to-play PC game.