No.
Not in Moscow. Rockets and bombs from Il is better. Also… Il doesn’t die 
Eh, the 110 is also very good.
Though it is a higher tier plane, so allies still wins out.
2 Likes
Well PZ 4 better against infantry than t28.
Well in tank vs tank, t50 the best, but we not play in wt.
He123 best fighter.
BF 110 best bomber fighter.
Ju just the best bomber.
Kiraly more funny than PPSh.
MG 34 and DT 29 simply have different purposes and methods of using.
MG 34 - rapid destruction of enemy manpower.
DT 29 - slower suppression, but more accurate and more convenient.
So I think the equally.
Well, except AVS, AVS in Moscow is OP.
So ZH needs to be improved somehow.
Come on 
- A powerful smg vs a fun smg isn’t equal.
- A tank good vs infantry vs a tank that will always survive (and thus becomes better vs infantry) isn’t equal
- Il just is the best all rounder bomber, and never dies
At least don’t say it’s equal 
. Also the numbers speak for themselves; Moscow axis is very often full of bots.
PPSh aren’t powerful, common shit.
T28 aren’t more survive than pz4.
Big different between t26/bt7 and pz3b/e in survival ability(seconds more good), but not between pz4 and t28(both mods).
Not good in bombing as Ju.
Not good in fight as He.
And in general - not fish, not meat.
Standard He123 from 4lvl can very easy down il2, I as very shit pilot was destroyed 5 il for one life on biplane.
Big part of Axis online - Germany lovers.
Germany lovers love what?Of course!Tigers, stg, panzerschrek, mg42, fg42.
This aren’t in Moscow, because Germany war technology was a shit in 41.
And also online devided between 5 campaigns, so online in every Axis side is low.
I didn’t understand this topics about “Devs are bias”, they must give Axis in Moscow maus, stg45,fg42-2, jet Me?
2 Likes
Come on friend, you can do better than this. You remember Moscow before the addition of t50? When it was still early lvls? It was fun, and at the time was the most balanced campaign there was. The time has just passed, now. I have a LOT more fun playing Italians at the moment and it should say something… even Axis Tunisia is better balanced (at later lvl) than Moscow is axis is.
Moscow is just not worth my time, weither it be as axis underdog or Soviets bot stompers. I’d rather they transform that campaign as pve only, it’d make more sense.
2 Likes
Problems in progression.
I played in April of the 21st year, and then everyone was on the starting tanks, with the starting weapons, bolt action.
It was fun. That’s all.
Does it depend on the parties?No. It only depends on the need to add new levels for old players. And for progression.
1 Like
And this of course does not work for players for the USSR and the U.S., who avenge their grandfathers?
It seems logical to me that there are far fewer ideological Axis players, since not as many people want to identify with the Nazis.
Here is funny, you yourself say that PPSh crap, although it is the best SMG game by all measures.
It seems to be asking for Pz4 F2. I do not know about it, but that’s what prevented instead of Pz3 J1 give Pz3 L. The same gun, just more armor.
I probably don’t want to talk about this with a lover of Germans.
It also will be offtopic.
It is voracious, so it is unpleasant to play with it. I liked VG 1.5, this is the best mp for me.(Although it’s a rifle)
If it is historical, at least in time frames, it does not matter the quantity.
Anyway, I’m sure that we will see some VK in Axis progression.
28 lvl Berlin USSR. Level 29 Allies in Tunisia.
Lol.
I play for the weapons and maps, I do not associate myself with the side of the conflict, I’m not a degenerate
statistically its the best smg, but i find myself to do more Kills with a mkb.
idk why.
1 Like
I think I would be the only one that pointed out the problem months ago…
Interestingly, you thought different at that time.
Of course I did. It wasn’t that bad back then, axis still had redeeming points. It still had the best lmg back then for example, as such it was still playable. There was still some players in axis as well.
But I can only endure so much BS like “here’s a beretta with only 20 rounds mags as counterpart to the ppsh41 rofllmaobbqlol” the recent premiums Lee, and now Katyusha with the t34 is the tiping point for me. I love the t34 in Stalingrad make no mistake, but here at least the pz4f2 is fearsome, not like yet another hand cranked turret pz3…
So yeah. I had my fun with this, but I’m not stepping in this shitshow again.
and I thought “no casualties” during special operation was bold statement.
No, but t-50 is.
But can rocket everything in field rather easily, including tanks due to prolonged markers.
Why fight when you cant be downed ?
Stalinium tofu ?
but could be, since the t-50 is as well there.
Well that explains the casualties of soviet side.
Sure, after all they would be nerfed to meet the needs of glorious stalinium army.
1 Like
And after last summer the following happens:
- nerf ZH29
- nerf MG34
- give Soviet T28E
Now they add T34. So their logic of balancing is making those who are weak even weaker, like always.
1 Like
I just don’t get it. The only ones defending this are either well known Soviet mains who love bot stomping or try hard challenge loving guys. I’m just a casual player, right in between: I have no fun getting stomped, and I’m bored if I’m stomping. I miss low lvl campaigns 
2 Likes
Very doubtful, but okay.
It also happens
What are you talking about?
He are not good against infantry as t28\pz4.
No, they not so effictivity as bombs.
IL-2 can normally downed.
…
T-50 was in 41.
The French also had better tanks
…
He needs to have a normal accuracy.
His accuracy right now is just a horror.
make a wild guess.
neither is Pz4 once its taken out by T-50.
Obviously if u cant hit with them. But those who can does quite effective job with them.
Well perhaps you can, since ur the pilot of it and u can succesfully kamikaze it but that doesnt exactly count.
And nowhere near moscow so who gives a fk ?
Thanks for (possibly) helping to convince the devs adding yet another time traveller in Moscow…
A marder or StuG 3 F would be fine but nooo…
It has to be that darn Panzer 4 F2…
Though, now that I look into wikipedia regarding the German options for an answer to T-34…
I have to admit there are few - Marders and other long 75 mm guns are not yet available for late 1941 - beginning of 1942 - the only options is that hilarious panzerjaeger 1, HEAT ammo for short barrel 75 mm, or a static AA gun of 88 mm.
Perhaps T-34 shouldn’t have been introduced in the Moscow to begin with.
For those wanting to complain about necro-ing the post - Is Your opinion still the same, now that we have Panzer 4 F2 in Moscow?
1 Like