Change the BR's of the m10, m18 and m4a2 76 (w)

Well now that Shermans have APHE, BR3 Allies are actually fine the way they are, its just still kinda sad that you have alot of vehicles with no usage.

I love how people keep asking for the Sherman 76 to be moved down when the IS-1 and Chi-Ri are arguably worse tanks at BR V. The problem is more along the lines of we needed a 6th BR yesterday for all the top end br5 kit(how many people do you see use a PPD-40 over a ppsh-41?)

The M10 and the M4A2 (76) are already in our planned list, M18 was already lowered from 5 to 4 a while ago

6 Likes

Nothing with long 75s should be at rank 3 either so no panzer IVs no Marders no Stug III Gs

Rank 3 makes more sense cause the M10 would be were its supposed to be countering long 75 Panzer IVs and as much as I love the M18 it shouldn’t go any lower than rank 3 with a modifier either.

1 Like

It could easily be BR2. It is literally inferior in every aspect to 75mm Shermans.

I bet that if the M10 was to be on the BR2. Most people would still prefer M8 Scott or M3 Lee anyway.

1 Like

No it has lighter armor than the Sherman it was one of the biggest complaints about it.

Chaffe is BR II and its better

2 Likes

you right i will still prefer m3 lee/grant since it dont expose my guy

but i will bring 2 tank squad so i can use M10 as well

Well the Chaffee is um… special.

Yeah, plus the turret traverse speed of M10 is so slow. It makes the vehicle utterly unfun to play. You’re forced to play it extremely passively.

The only good thing about M10 is its look. I really like its design visually. But that’s pretty much it.

No problem M8A1 is the same Matilda is miles better M10 can be a starting BR III tank but in BR IV is just not the place for this tank same way Japan B5N2 is BR I vehicle .Even the A.C.I is looking good compared to M10. It should be the next tank after the Crusader.

The problem the M18 and M10 have is DF have balanced them based on the guns they use and not Their actual capabilities.

1 Like

the M10 gun is same as the Sherman and the Sherman is BR III so how this thing can be BR IV since we have M18 at BR IV

1 Like

it has lighter armor than the sherman and is extremely sluggish which makes it a bad tank overall

1 Like

but we are talking about putting it into BR2, which is crazy

not really, it doesnt have good armor, its a really sluggish tank, its turret traverse is horrible, its crew is exposed cause its an open top and it has almost no defensive armament

Well, by that logic dicker max and 88 truck can also go to BR2, i think putting those to BR3 makes sense, you guys are streching it.

Have you played it?

You should.

And then tell me you’d prefer it over tanks like M8 Scott or M3 Lee.

There’s nothing crazy about putting M10 to BR2

what about Achilles tho it literally M10 but better ammo, pretty much same armor, same weakness.