If they add calvary, they should add these:
- Let me feed the horse some grass real quick
- Add this sword and spear:
2 Likes
Its pretty fun though when im with hans with mg34 hiding in bushes to just destroy people from spawn. But I say that they are fast to reach zone in confrontation matches.
In Battlefield 1, the calvaries are pretty good. So you can try adding it to enlisted only if they buff the health of the rider by ton for calvary to be good.
should shift it to TT calvary or premium
Just straight up hilarious to think of it tho, like what if… Hahahaha 
1 Like
At this point you are writing untruths.
The Soviets used cavalry extensively until 1945.
Italy and Germany also had their units.
I support the idea
2 Likes
No. You have no clue what are you talking about.
Yes, they were using cavalry. But only as fast moving infantry.
They definitely weren’t cavalry charging on frontline.
It makes literally no sense for horses to be added in Enlisted.
Steiner Counter attack with cavalry charge 
2 Likes
You are writing nonsense, because in 1945 the Soviets sometimes attacked German infantry with a charge, which surprised them when they retreated.
Read about the combat route of General Belov’s 1st Guards Cavalry Regiment.
Or about a group of Polish cavalry near Borujsko on March 1, 1945.
There is no point in writing about something you have no idea about.
I support adding Cavalry to Enlisted
2 Likes
Lol xDDD you are talking about like 5 moments during the whole war. Meanwhile ignoring the classic usage. The horses served primarily to transport these soldiers somewhere quickly and unexpectedly.
But it certainly wasn’t as if they were shooting at Germans from backs of those horses. That’s really bizarre.
No, Calvary charges are definitely not how cavalry regiments operated regularly .
They were used as highly maneuverable infantry. That’s all.
I am not against adding cavalry regiments to Enlisted. But I am against adding horses.
There were more than 5 such situations, so I advise you to read professional literature and not sit and write nonsense on the forum.
Cavalry fought mainly on foot, although mounted charges did occur.
So there are no contraindications to adding it to Enlisted.
1 Like
Dude, that was figuratively said.
But I am not really surprised… This is pointless.
Well, I agree with you there. Your comments make no sense and are pointless.
Lol xDDD you are like having prototypes in game that never saw frontline use or mass production and, in some cases, never existed. Meanwhile ignoring the classic usage.
Yes, I do.
Horse charges on streets of Stalingrad, beaches of Normandy or Pacific island truly weren’t a classic usage of cavalry regiment during ww2.
I’m not really going to compare the prototypes to the bizarre use of cavalry regiments in an environment where, moreover, they don’t fit at all.
Ok, nor were motorcycles, British Tunisia uniforms, and really tanks used in the Pacific but here we are.
Since the merge everything is a mismatch, if you care about things being in their proper place then lets undo the merge, until then, find a valid point.
I just don’t want horses to be in Enlisted, that’s all.
But I am glad you pointed out my behavior, I acted like an idiot. Shameful.
1 Like