I just want my historical rates of fires for guns…
Until a case gets proven for a perticular RoF to be more likely than the rest it can stay as is.
I wasn’t perticularly impressed by a certain youtube video of the FNAB (though the documentation and article by the same creator following it was intriguing), the guy in the video wrote later in the description that his example only had the number “1” on it, which would be impressive since (according to Ian, aka “Gun Jesus”) all known and certified real examples are within the 5000 range. Getting the first factory production or pre-production prototype is no small feat for any gun, but until more data is available a single (and concerning) example isn’t much to go on…
2 Likes
That’s too low. Should be 550 rof at base
6 Likes
Sure then drop the mag from 40!to 30 or move it to br3
It has 24 11 recoil so if you buff you just neef
You have overpowered m1a1, we will keep 40 rounds thank you very much
1 Like
Not with a 30 percent rof buff and laser accuracy, so higher rate of fire I am thinking less accurate
So what’s the issue? it would be less accurate due rof increase and have crappy dmg
I mean state wise lass accurate not omg I have a fire hose it’s hard to aim, I mean hard stats harder to aim. Nif so then we agree, no the sky is falling, hides under table
@OggeKing @Dregomz
I understand your reasons. Yes, I would like historically accurate figures, especially since a lot of guns from all factions would actually perform better, but I have decided just to buff the rate of fire by 50 due to balancing. There should be no reason for a BR I gun to fire faster than a BR II gun, unless it’s the PPD which sucks anyway.
1 Like
I don’t want to ruin your day but Fnab-43 is a BR2 weapon not BR1.
And nothing would stop them from making two separate versions of FNAB-43 early (400rpm) + FNAB-43 late (550-600rpm)
3 Likes
true very unique until face off with russian soldier with a uragan
2 Likes
Yeah, let’s just ruin any uniqueness the weapon has. Because it’s definitely better to have 2 weapons with same rate of fire than with different ones.
And if you think mp34 is better, literally nothing is forcing you to put it to your BR2 line up.
1 Like
That’s the whole point I’m getting at. NO BR I weapon should be better than a BR II weapon. 40 rounds in a magazine doesn’t make it any better than the MP34, especially with a slower fire rate.
It’d be just my luck that they nerf the MP34 instead…
1 Like
MP34 is not better than Fnab. 
Plus there are many ways how to actually buff the weapon without touching its unique rate of fire. I really don’t understand this obsession with ruining anything that’s unique.
Arguably. Either way, a 50 or 80rpm buff still doesn’t retract from the FNABs appeal or role, it just makes it better at it. The accuracy and recoil are already good enough, which is why everyone only suggests rpm buffs.
If anything with this weapon I would rather a dmg buff but that would likely require a BR increase, which I personally would not mind, it is not an early war weapon as far as I know.
5.8 or 6.0 damage wouldn’t be bad (the MP40 has 5.8 and it’s in the same BR).
kinda unique = kinda unusable, especially when almost every smg you face hits just as hard, has relatively the same recoil but shoots twice as fast. 
If we’re gonna leave the FNAB at 400, then drop it to level one. It would shoot as slow as a Grease gun, and with less power.
1 Like
I would much rather a faster firing FNAB-43. Even 450rpm gives it purpose, as it’s a more refined MP34. And in BR I, I would still choose the MP34 because it’s objectively better.
1 Like
But but thats the unique part ? Its unusable
Worse dispersion than mp40, recoil about the same.
Theres just 0 reason to use it.
3 Likes
