Just regarding the Kursk debate:
Kursk in War Thunder is logical.
But Kursk in Enlisted??? Kursk may be a city but when anyone says ‘Battle of Kursk WWII’ everyone thinks heaps of tanks going head to head on a large open field.
Now even if that was practical in Enlisted (Id argue it’s not), the fact is we can only have 2 tanks per team each round at a certain time.
So 4 tanks total on the battlefield, that’s not really a Kursk experience is it?
Some people have suggested previously a ‘special consideration’ for Kursk allowing more tank spawns but I cant see that happening for one map (and it would be difficult to implement).
I really dont understand the obsession with Kursk. Budapest looks far more interesting, I personally have argued for Vienna since Ive been there and Id like to see Austrian locations in game.
There’s lots of opportunities with Budapest, like Hungarian squads, a summer late war map for Germany-USSR, a large city that isnt Berlin or Stalingrad (Stalingrad maps suck anyway).
We havent seen Hungarian architecture in game yet and Budapest/Hungary more broadly isnt covered in games often.
Indeed I wish Enlisted would make battles that arent as common (fix D Day for a start),
eg. Tobruk, Kokoda Track, Balikpapan, Singapore, Vienna, Budapest, Sino-Japanese War generally, Syria-Lebanon campaign, early and/or late war Poland, the list goes on.
Rather than the same old same old:
Kursk, D Day, Berlin, Stalingrad, Iwo Jima
that every single WWII game and documentary has waaayy over done.
