Is this trolling? Photos are searched for on the Internet immediately. The partisans have MP 40, they obviously don’t count. The Panzerfaust was the most massive trophy and it is justified by the balance. The rest was supplied by the USA and Great Britain.
Great so remove
As 44
Rd 44
T20
Hyde
And all the other weapons that did not see usage in ww2.
That line was crossed a long time ago.
But adding Axis content has to be historically accurate?
Youre right you are clearly bias in your opinions as well.
I’m not talking about using it, read it again 
. I’m talking about at least having them on the country’s territory. Labora Fontbernat M-1938 simply wasn’t in Germany . It didn’t exist at all!
According to your logic, spanish guns cant be added because spain wasnt fighting in ranks of wehrmacht, except volunteers.
But at same time you seem to be totally fine with soviets with faust, p40 etc.
double standards much ?
1 Like
How hard it all is… Photos or documents about the presence of Spanish weapons. In the photos of the blue division they are armed with German weapons.
I don’t mind if they add the Astra M903, for example, the Germans bought it, but the Labora Fontbernat M-1938 submachine gun is nonsense.
sure, show me few photos of ass-47 in frontline troops usage. Il wait here.
1 Like
I’m not talking about using them on the front lines, you made that up yourself . I’m talking about them just being on the premises, they could be stored, like weapon prototypes, for example.
that design…
1 Like
The photo is Spain… It’s useless.
Well you said the weapon did not exist.
That shows an assembly line so it probably did exist.
specially when * ≈ 1,000 - 2,000 were built xD
but maybe it’s just our imagination xD
1 Like
During WW2 the spanish “Astra 600” pistol was also produced in spain only. Nevertheless Spain gave Nazi Germany 10,000 of them (until 1944).
But according to DELAVR’s logic, it’s probably useless because production facilities and pictures were only in spain. 
No, you’re lying again, I literally said:
Yes, it was not, on the territory of Germany, nor in the Blue Division. Learn to read, it can be useful, considering that the game has a return rating of 16+ as far as I remember.
Im lying again?
Where have i lied before?
Quote
“I’m not talking about using it, read it again . I’m talking about at least having them on the country’s territory. Labora Fontbernat M-1938 simply wasn’t in Germany . It didn’t exist at all!”
1 Like
A… You probably mean about the last sentence, I meant that the weapon not only did not fight and was not produced on the territory of Germany, but that it was not there in any form. In any case, you have not provided any evidence of the presence of this submachine gun in Germany or its use in the Blue Division. It is unclear why Germany should have it.
I agree with you. Like I wrote above: french resistance also used them.
“…the Labora Fontbernat M-1938 was even smuggled into france by spanish partisans, where it was used against the german occupying forces…”
→ that weapon was beyond its one territory xD
the requirement seems to shift constantly, first it was nationality thing and now it has some sort of territorial requirement.
So whats the next requirement if someone actually does find a photo ?
2 Likes
The requirements for adding a weapon are incredibly simple - that this nation has this weapon. Germany did not have this submachine gun in any unit.
Okay, let’s give the US another guerrilla unit, I don’t mind.