why exactly are you using WarThunder stats? 
they are not the same like in Enlisted 
2 examples: according to you BF-109F-1 & F-2 have 19sec turnrate (in Enlisted - see the stats card above - it 16.29sec) and 17.86m/s climrate while it’s in Enlisted 20.80m/s
16.29m/s is instantaneous turn time, not sustained turn time
War Thunder states sustained turn time
Enlisted lists imstant best turn time
the turn infact is identical just different criteria
Climb rate in War Thunder is listed as average whilst Enlsted uses max best climb rate at sea level, not the average climb rate to ‘x’ altitude
The performance of BF-109F-1/F-2 in Enlisted is the same as it is in WT
Planes like A5M4, BF-109C, I-16 , P-40B belong at BR I
planres with 1160 horsepower engines with very good power to weight ratio and speed like BF-109F-1/F-2 have no business there
Bf 109 E-7/ /U2 had the Daimler-Benz DB-601N engine and that one was available with either with 1.020HP or 1.200HP. And if Darkflow added the 1.200HP than that one is no valid argument
Actually… BF-109E-7 in WT has 1175PS DB-601E engine and it does in Enlisted as well
You can tell by the max speed being 591km/h (same as in WT) as well as whopping 23.55m/s climb rate at sea level
BF-109B - BR I
BF-109C - BR I
BF-109D - BR I
BF-109E-3 - BR II
BF-109E-7 - BR II
BF-109F-1 - BR II
BF-109F-2 - BR II
BF-109F-4 - BR III
BF-109G-2 - BR III
BF-109G-6 (DB-605A) - BR III
BF-109G-6 (DB-605AM) - BR IV
BF-109G-14 (DB-605AM) - BR IV
BF-109G-14 (DB-605ASM) - BR IV
BF-109G-10 (DB-605DB) - BR IV
BF-109K-4 (DB-605DB) - BR IV
BF-109K-4 (DB-605DC) - BR V
This is fair ^^^
BF-109E-7 WT datasheet
Yes youre right my bad
DB-601N engine
Still a 1175PS engine, just like DB-601E, just bit lower critical alt than DB-601E
(Giving BF-109E-7 max speed at 4000m instead of 6000m for F-1/F-2)
In enlisted you fight sub 4000m all the time so DB-601E has no real advantage over DB-601N
F-1 & F-2 using also the same DB-601N engine (with less HP) and not the DB-601E engine with 1160 Horsepower
DB-601N have 1175PS (1160HP)
BF-109E-7 and BF-109F-1/ F-2 use DB-601N
Just realised DB-601E is BF-109F-4 engine
DB 601 E – major revision of the DB 601, pressurized water cooling for higher operating temperatures, up to 1350 hp (993 kW) takeoff power - according to my sources.
What you should be focusing is giving 109’s their missing suspended armament
BR II
BF-109E-7 with 4x 50kg
BF-109F-1 with 4x 50kg
BF-109F-2 with 4x 50kg
BR III
BF-109F-4 with 4x 50kg
BF-109G-2 with 4x 50kg
BF-109G-6 / A with 4x 50kg
BR IV
BF-109G-6 /AM with 1x 250kg
BF-109G-14 / ASM with 1x 250kg
BF-109G-10 with 1x 250kg
BR V
BF-109K-4 with 1x 250kg
1 Like
then I never would be finished. xD
I have such a huge list (changes, new stuff, bugs, … ) and working from the top to the botton
BF-109G-6 [Slovak State]
BF-109G-6 sold to other axis nations were given only DB-605A - 1475PS engine
Only German G-6 later adopted DB-605AM - 1800PS
Later more aerodynamically revised G-6 bcame G-14’s and were powered by DB-605AM as well but eventually got the high altitude DB-605ASM , 1800PS engine as well
is one of my “to-dos” - suggesting (changing) it to a 250kg bomb instead of 4x50kg on BR IV
Why do people mention HP in a game where they limit planes?
F-1 and F-2 definitely seem like a downgrade, specially the F-2 that feels like peashooting with its 15mm ‘cannon’.
The F-2 could get the cermet ammo, but not sure if too strong for BR2?
Also the F-4/trop feels a bit underwhelming at BR3 with only x1 20mm cannon and no bombload, it could be buffed with either +2x15mm cannons or 4x50kg bombload like all the other got.
2 Likes
If I am not mistaken, it would carry a single 250kg bomb or like you suggested 50kg (not sure if 2 or 4). Would also be a good idea to give that one a bit more love
suggestion was made 
2 Likes
Any of these additions would be greatly welcomed.
1 Like
BTW this is the cermet ammo available to the F-2 variant. With 51mm pen it could then snipe tanks and actually become a viable plane.
3 Likes