Br changes suggestions

Suggestions
1

Hello here is an list for br changes i think would be good. Please tell your opinions about them. Also if you have more suggestions please tell

Iar 81c br 1 to br 3 too many bombs for being a br 1 fighter

mp 18 br 2 to br 1 worse than br 1 mp 34

pz 2 f br 1 to br 2 the flamethrower is too powerful for br 1

pz sfl lc br 2 to br 1 no reason to pick it over puma or panzer 3 j1

r 75 br 2 to br 1 biker squads only consist of 2 soldiers so it being br 1 is completely reasonable

sdkfz 7 br 2 to br 1 unarmed apcs should not be on the same br as armed ones

ovp m1918 br 2 to br 1 worse than ppd 34 which is in br 1

carcano m1891 br 2 to br 1 poor sights and quite slow firerate. Does not compare to other br 2 rifles

breda 88 pxi br 2 to br 1 potez has more payload and is in br 1

fw 190 a 1 br 2 to br 1 no bombs, low ammo for 20mm and poor flight performance

gewehr 98 br 2 to br 1 worse performance compared to kar98k

stug 3f br 3 to br 2 bad armour, no turret, no mg. No reason to use over panzer 4

Bf 109 f4 trop br 3 to br 1 no bombs, only 1 20mm

fw 190 a4 br 3 to br 2 no bombs and poor flight performance

fiat g55 br 4 to br 3 good plane but not enough for br 4

beretta m38a 40 rounds br 4 to br 3 beretta m38/42 is in br 3 and it is almost the same gun

Bf 110 g2 br 3 to br 4 too powerful making the 2 other bf 110 pointless in br 3

Rpzb 43 ofenrohr br 4 to bt 5 the most powerful at weapon in the game by far.

panzer 4h br 4 to br 3 almost identical to the br 3 panzer 4j with just slightly faster turret

me 410 a1 u2 br 4 to br 3 it would fill bf 110 g2s place. 4 rockets is not enough in br 4

bf 109 g6 br 4 to br 3 if p51 d5 can be in br 3 the so can bf 109 g6

me 410 b1 br 4 to br 3 very comparable to whirlwind that is in br 3

8,8 cm flak 37 sfl br 4 to br 3 no armor and open top. Br 4 already has tiger and panther

panzerwerfer 42 br 4 to br 3 rockets are iffy and the truck has no armor. Panzer 3n is better

panzer 4/70v br 5 to br 4 too weak for br 5 in comparison to tiger 2

kiraly 39m br 5 to br 4 and buff doesn’t compete with assault rifles and is worse than ppsh 41

bf 109 g 14 br 5 to br 4 no bombs and worse flight performance compared to bf 109 g10

bf 109 g14 underwing cannons br 5 to br 4

fw 190 a 8 br 5 to br 4 2 rockets is way too weak armament in br 5

mkb 42 h br 5 to br 4 worst german assault rifle. Acts more like an smg with slightly more damage

stg 45 m br 5 to br 4 same as mkb 42h

mkb 42 w br 5 to br 4 same as mkb 42h

gerät 03 br 5 to br 4 worse than winchester g30r and is one br higher

suomi kp 31 br 5 to br 4 slow firerate makes the weapon useless compared to assault rifles

krieghoff fg br 5 to br 4 Overall worse performance compared to fg 42

breda pg cr br 5 to br 4

ptrs 41 br 2 to br 1 m1 bazooka overshadows ptrs 41. Also type 97 is br 1

pps 43 br 2 to br 3 overperforming in low br compared to the rest

mosin m91/30 rifle br 2 to br 1 sniper variant is already in br 1

Gaz AAA br 2 to br 1 same as sdkfz 7

p 40 e-1 br 2 to br 3 and buff very large bomb payload for br 2

su 2 m82 br 2 to br 3 6 100kgs and forward facing mgs. Do I need to say more?

ppsh 41 box br 3 to br 4 or nerf more accurate than stationary mgs. needs to be nerfed or uptiered

il 2 37 br 3 to br 2 only 2 100kg bombs and mediocre 37mm cannons

la 5fn br 3 to br 2 low ammo count and only 2 50kgs

Pe-3 br 3 to br 2 really small payload for br 3

a 20 boston mk 3 br 3 to br 2 too small payload

ppd 40 br 5 to br 4 underperforming in br 5

su 85m br 5 to br 4 no turret, no mg and mediocre cannon for high br

is 1 br 5 to br 4 more comparable to tiger 1 and panther rather than tiger 2

la 7 br 5 to br 4 way too small payload for br 5

il 10 br 5 to br 4 poor maneuverability and small payload for br 5

I 185 m82 br 5 to br 3 comparable with br 3 p51 d5

su 100 br 5 to br 4 no turret and no mg

pp shpitalniy 1940 br 5 to br 4 slow firerate and poor damage compared to assault rifles

m3 stuart/flamethrower br 1 to br 2 flamethrower is too powerful for br 1

hurricane mk IIb trop br 1 to br 2 due to the bombs and large amount of mgs the plane deserves br 2

m1917 enfield br 2 to br 1 no bayonet and low capacity compared to lee enfield

ross mk 3 br 2 to br 1 no bayonet and low capacity compared to lee enfield

WLA br 2 to br 1 same as r75

studebaker 6 u1 br 2 to br 1 same as sdkfz 7

p 38g br 2 to br 3 6 rockets for a fighter plane is too much in br 2

m8a1 gmc br 2 to br 1 worse cannon than normal m8 gmc and horrible solid shot

ap 1 br 3 to br 2 mediocre payload and really bad maneuverability

browning m1918 br 3 to br 2 and nerf 3 different bars in br 3 is too much

lanchester model 1 br 3 to br 2 horrible recoil and no reason to use it over thompson in br 3

m4a3 105 br 3 to br 4 give it heat and it will fit br 4 greatly

achilles br 4 to br 3 open top, bad turret traverse, bad armor and solid shot

mosquito fb mk vi br 4 to br 3 comparable to whirlwind

m10 gmc br 4 to br 3 decent cannon, open top, bad turret traverse, bad armor

p 38e br 3 to br 1 no payload and bad maneuverability

ap 4c br 4 to br 5 large amount of rockets makes this definitely worth br 5

m1928a1 drum br 5 to br 4 comparable with br 4 smgs such as tokyo and ppd

m4a2 76w br 5 to br 4 worst br 5 cannon and bad armor

sherman ic firefly br 5 to br 4 horrible solid shot and poor armor

type 99 rifle late br 2 to br 1 lowest firerate of any bolt action for japan

ka chi br 2 to br 1 poor maneuverability, bad armor and bad cannon

type 94 isuzu br 2 to br 1 same as sdkfz 7

b5n2 br 3 to br 2 no forward facing guns and only one bomb drop

a6m3 br 3 to br 2 drop tank is almost always useless

type 1 smg br 3 to br 2 worst iron sights in the game

ho ni 3 br 3 to br 2 poor armor, no mg, no turret, decent cannon

type otsu br 3 to br 2 only 5 rounds and worse than type hei

type 4 rifle br 4 to br 3 comparable with br 3 garand and g41

d4y1 br 4 to br 2 comparable with br 2 ju 87 r2

j2m3 br 5 to br 4 gets overshadowed by ki 84 ko

ki 61 hei br 4 to br 3 armament fits for br 3 better

type hei lmg br 4 to br 5 stats are better than br 5 type hei auto

1 Like
2

Imo all mg should be br2, everything else is good stuff

3

Too many things at once, if you want to suggest BR changes I recommend making individual posts, as it’s way easier to get people who agree with the suggestion

7 Likes
4

I think it’s the premium plane, not the mg… :thinking:

5

Real, there are changes with which I agree with but many of them are too radical.

2 Likes
6

Dumb i am :smile:

7

Forgiven you are!

b384221e44cc8d222f1df1b85f3ee315

1 Like
8

Can you give examples? I would wanna know because i think these all are reasonable

9

These are just that caught my eye, people could argue about these for weeks.

1 Like
10

Thanks for telling me. I will try to explain myself and maybe we can get a compromise

The plane has too much bomb for br 1. I would be fine if it would be put only in br 2 but i feel that it could also work in br 3. Both would work honestly

The tank has bad armour and no cannon but the flamethrowers can shoot through walls making it really deadly for unprepared enemy. If they could make it not shoot through walls it would definitely be fine in br 1

I honestly dont see anybody using this plane. Planes without bombs will always be unpopular amongst players but atleast most of them are great at dogfighting like the spitfire and bf 109 g10. Sadly the fw 190 is not one of them due to the bad maneuverability. I dont think dropping it down would matter much and it would still stay unpopular but atleast i could use it in br 1 deck

The gun is statistically almost the same as its br 3 counterpart and it doesnt feel like an good high br weapon compared to the others. Also if germans get more smgs dropped to br 4 such as suomi kp and kiraly it would leave beretta useless

The plane feels br 3 in my opinion. Its old normandy rival p 51 d5 is also br 3 along with its berlin counterpart la 5fn

The weapon is exponentially worse compared to ppsh 41 box. Also i think the only smgs that deserve br 5 are the op ones such as 100 round thompson, cönders and lad. Other smgs would get overshadowed by assault rifles

It is almost the same as breda pg carcano only exception being the burst firemode that is really inaccurate. But i wouldnt mind it staying in br 5 as i own a lot of the carcano ones

At rifles just suck in the game and should all be br 1. You can barely frontal pen br 2 tanks with it and it doesnt do a lot post pen. You will need to shoot multiple mags for the ammo rack to make it explode. Also if japan and ussr will fight one day there will be huge imbalance due to japanese getting their 20mm at rifle in br 1 while soviets have to suffer with their slow firing ptrd.

It is the standard issue rifle of the red army and there are lot better options like the winchester in br 2. Also mosin dragoon gets to be in br 1 even if it has faster firerate. Br 2 should only have fast firing or high capacity bolties while the rest will get put in br 1

I havent unlocked him yet but i have tried it in big action and checked the loadout. 6 100kgs is really large payload for br 2 but i could see it staying in br 2

As i said i dont think many smgs deserve br 5. I would have also put ppsh 41 in br 4 but i fear that it would make ppd 40 and ppd 34 obsolete. I rarely see anybody use t5 smgs due to assault rifles being in same br

2 250kg bombs is the loadout you see for most br 3 planes such as p 51 d5, whirlwind, b5n2, bf 110 etc but it would be too strong in br 3 due to the 23mm cannons so i think br 4 is great middle ground. Ofcourse it would leave ussr without any br 5 attacker plane but that could be changed if they add better ones

I dont own it myself but what i see in the stats it has the same cannon as sherman and it aint great. Also there is already bt 7a f32 with much better cannon in br 1 so i think m8a1 fits there aswell

I know it is controversial opinion and it has been discussed a lot in the forums but if they would give it a small nerf it would definitely go well with the brens. Also it would allow low br enjoyers to use us mgs for us soldiers instead of bren

I took into account that achilles has great penetration but it still struggles against german big cats. Even if it pens it barely does any post pen while panthers in the same br can oneshot it from anywhere. Also we cant forget its open top turret that makes it vulnerable for even small arms fire.

The plane got no payload and it has poor maneuverability compared to br 2 spitfires. In br 1 it would atleast see some use amongst new players

I see no reason for this thing to be in br 5 competing against stg 44s and fedorovs. It only works as an placeholder until usa gets their assault rifle.

Firefly is more comparable to panther than a kt. The fact that it potentially can pen big cats doesnt make it op. It suffers from bad post pen and poor armour that can even be penned by br 2 tanks. It being br 5 makes no sense

Again might be controversial but this thing just sucks. It has bad recoil and probably the worst irons in the entire game. Japan already has a ton of good br 3 smgs such as sig 1920 and type 100 late. Type 1 is more comparable with mp 28 50 round.

Thanks for your feedback