A completely out of context argument that makes literally no sense.
I have no idea why I shouldn’t buy a pre-order bundle’s with guerrillas just because I don’t like their current state and I complained about it.
I’ve suggested a several changes. And I pointed out things that I think are badly designed and doesn’t fit the current format of the game.
And I was mostly right. This class is irrelevant for most of the time. And in the few cases where it’s not irrelevant, it’s just toxic. And it’s still not a solution for grey zone tanks.
But I guess I can’t support the game if I’m complaining about something.
I’ve never complained about deserters. In fact, I’ve encouraged people to desert as long as it’s beneficial to them. It’s not their fault this game has such broken function as desertion is.
I was complaining about desertion itself. And that it’s just a deliberately badly designed function.
The desertion is still more profitable for people who desert than for people who actually stay in the fight and doesn’t trying to bypass the system for their own selfish benefits.
That’s what I was complaining about.
I never wanted to ban desertion. I just wanted desertion penalties so staying in the game would always be more profitable than deserting.
As it is in all similar games, starting with WT and ending with WoT.
They should just lock army/faction as long as it is present in battle from which you have deserted. A very common and logical practice across similar games.
But you’re a known wannabe sarcastic dude, all the while twisting the facts to fit your narrative every time. It’s so pathetic.
I dont know.
If you dont support it, you usually dont buy it. You dont like McDonalds only to eat there regulary. You dont like fast fashion just to keep buying ten H&M jeans per month. Because everything else makes you a hypocrite.
Also, if you buy it, it will certainly not make the developers change their position/ status quo.
But I know, you are kinda late on the hate-train and always change your position when they release new premiums to consoom, so I guess you need time to get it.
Support the game but dont support the current shift of the game but you still need to support the game even if it means supporting the current shift of the game you dont like…
Makes sense. That will teach them to change the direction.
No, just that deserters are selfish (unlike the humble Adam in front of me) and destroy the game for others.
Totally different.
While still profiting from it. Not gonna lie, that is funny.
Is this like Trump where he complains about Clinton allowing him to evade paying taxes, which he abuses by his hearth?
Ok, 35 days is better than a month - I guess it’ll be doable. Thanks for the numbers, looks less like Mission Impossible this way. But will probably still lose my enlisted streak soon because of the change, and I still think they should reduce the price to 500 gold with the new format if their intention was not making it more than twice as expensive.
Then reward people for staying, the reward for winning is so high loosing is a reason for most to deserting, i save it for my ai in training teammate calling in a bombing run before my arty strike, at the games start
Remember also that there are bonus free BP levels from the military ranks too!
So, F2P will be able to do 4 tasks per day (usually doing this extra one in the same time it takes to do 3, since you can do them together after just one is completed), they will get 6 free levels from the weekly tasks, they will get a few more levels from the military ranks, AND have 35 days to do 30 tasks.
So in theory, a F2P player will be able to complete each BP in <20 days of playing, with still around 15 (or more) extra days in case one is missed, which is ~40% of the days per each BP season.
We tried to give F2P as much leeway as possible with it to make this aspect of the BP improved for all. Bare in mind Elite BP holders can do it in less than 10 days, plus get all the bonus equipment (many more versions of each weapon, more soldiers, 2x vehicle camos) as well as only needing a one-time purchase assuming they do play for 10 days every month. This also excludes all the Gold received back too from playing the game.
I actually believe that players has the reason to keep the gold orders.
Both of these two Pz 4 F2s came from Stalingrad, but one of them has been equipped with additional armor. This can be said there are ‘just better’ items between different BP seasons (and not to mention preferences), so do, for example the Type Hei 10 and Type Hei Late, as well as Soldiers’ classes (like Flametrooper II undoubtly overwhelmed Flametrooper I).
All that sounds good, but with 10 EUR/BP for 1 month for an otherwise FP game it’s just the limit where it becomes harder to convince myself regarding the benefits for a game played 1 or 2 nights weekly.
Old version: basically pay 3 EUR/month to get a lot of tasks and rewards with no push for completing the battle pass. That’s a no brainer - take my money! I still have an evening left and I am 3 tasks away from the last necessary 100 golds for the next free ride, so that’s a plus.
During this summer/autumn I was off so long that I could not comment on forum at least twice, when I’m quite sure the new format’s next month free battle pass was an unreachable thing, and where the old format was more flexible. So I feel that with the new format I lose some time flexibility and I have a higher, less appealing entry fee cost/duration-wise. We’ll see.
Exactly. The devs should remember that video games are something that helps people unwind, go to a friendly place and do some satisfying things. If there is pressure and negative motivation (like fear of missing out), the game loses it’s appealing value.
That’s why I stopped playing WT and I’m not going back, looking on how it is rights now.
I wonder if there are any sources can support that these two are really PPSh-“45”, as it sounds really illogical for Shpagin to make another compact SMG after the PPS, he’s own PPSh-2, and the so-called “Experimental PPSh with a Detachable Stock”, in 1945, where there are plenty of tests for new intermediate caliber rounds.
And notice the rear sight: why a 1945 prototype is using the early 1941 version? The early tangent sight has a maximum range of 500 meters, how can a compact weapon use this design?
Well, they still won’t be able to get multiple pieces of the same BP weapon. Unless it returns as a reward for the event at some point in the future.
Which simply wasn’t the case up until now.
F2P players could get 4 of the same BP weapon.
Because they simply weren’t forced to waste their gold orders on weapons they didn’t want. Instead, they could invest those orders in the weapons they wanted.
So don’t present this change as something extremely pro-f2p player.
This weapon looks much more suitable for an event paratrooper squad. It’s a shame that we can only get 4 of these which is not enough to equip an entire paratrooper squad.
Their clever here, The first two BP weapons are either OP or desirable. Though the PPSH reskin is absolutely going to bite them in the ass, id be surprised if half the people that normally get the BP get that one.
F2P used to, in the current system, get 1 random gold order depending on the BP type.
Now, they get at least 1 guaranteed weapon, and 1 guaranteed soldier, at a much quicker pace than before (fewer levels to achieve it, and therefore can get 3x this (meaning 3 different weapons and 3 different soldiers) in the time they would get just 1 prior).
Nah I would wait too if I knew you could do that, I just dont like the shitty inventory being full of junk I’m not currently using. Not when theres no way to sort it atm.
Not to mention it will always be funny to do goofy shit in game so people like yourself, cry at you “for wasting resources” or something, as if you didnt gather all those resources yourself.
Though on the flip side here, he can just claim all his event rewards now so its less of an issue.
