Battle of Moscow (Not KV-1/ but a KV-2)

Suggestions
22

The stuka do Cas support not air support, stuka cant do dogfight il2 yes, i mean il2 is all rounder compared to the stuka, il2 can do both roles for air support is a better choice, for cas attack #stukalife

23

Jesus those threads :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy:

24

ah i thought you meant for CAS instead of AA, my bad

1 Like
25

is this an out of season april fools post ?

26

its always the IL-2

you guys are sleeping on the Sb-2m. 6x100kg is busted, especially since its highly manouverable and super easy to aim (it feels so good to fly). the defensive guns, coupled with its ability to consume multiple tons of lead makes it unkillable by anything but a Bf 110.

its the best at pure CAS in moscow by a long shot

27

Read m8 i sayed air superiority not cas

28

i responded to your list not the other stuff

29

List of stuff is a basic one withaut specify anything because if i have to specify wy soviet are strong in moscow i have to write a topic for all the night

30

look all im saying is just that people are sleeping on the Sb-2m

its not that deep

31

Well say this to the one wo say soviet moscow suffer is upper to my comment

32

no

33

Ok i dont care aniway, you can always open a sb-2m appricietion topic for illuminate people mind, sir if you want excuse meā€¦

34

754(r) isnā€™t that what the PPSH is called in Stalingrad?

35

The Moscow maps are too cluttered, I donā€™t think heavy tanks would do good, and honestly itā€™s too tight, this would encourage camping until reload is complete

36

Nah, Brummbar has much better Armor than KV, has much better shells too. And would be more out of place than M2c and Jumbo. :smiley:

Soo how about Dicker Max vs KV-2? That would be pretty good imo.

Nope, that is MP-717(r).

37

Open top, worse armor, no mg
and i think it only carries 15 shells :thinking:

Nah i prefer a stug or a hetzer

38

Stug has same armor as Dicker Max. And Hetzer is 1944 vehicle.

39

You know we just do a bit of time traveling~

Thatā€™s hard to believe but still having more armor doesnā€™t mean more survivability

D Max is taller, open top and doesnā€™t has 50mm in every part of the front and no sloped armor while the stug has, yeah i prefer a stug

40

But butā€¦
It has no turret? :fox_face:

Anyway this post is bait, so I was just filling it with sarcasm and satires :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

1 Like
41

Dicker Max has much better gun that can compete with KV-2.

Please, no timetraveling.

Stug III at Moscow would be A version, with short 75mm as Panzer IV has and has only 50mm Armor. It has less crew and shity gun depresion, Dicker Max has excelent one, soo you can easily camp behind hill and enemy cant almost see you. 105mm gun is much better in compatison with 152mm gun on KV-2 than Stugs 75mm gun that is in Moscow already on multiple vehicles.

But really nice depresion. And tbh, Tank destroyers are fun in Enlisted imo, i use them most of time, Semovente is love and Jagdpanzer in Berlin bounces enemy shots more than it should. :smiley: