Question each germut player has asked ever since the moscow was released.
Soviet Moscow is the shitesd side ever…
and you Guys still answer him?
well back in a day where there wasnt any cryharders from video games (i mean ww2 era) the full auto rifles with proper rifle cartridge performed underwhelmingly and thats why russians turned to intermediate rifles like Ak-47 instead after war … so you want the Avs and Avt and Akt to behave better than they should ? i smell bias on demand here…
he just trying to cry too much
Pervers, really.
This is what happens if the Soviets cant spam PPSh anymore… at least when the Germans are able to shoot back.
Guess which is the reaons its free in SG.
- On release it was 2op MG
- Now it is to 2op Kiraly and MKB42
axis too weak, yeee, another story
Yeeee, another cool story, bob, about too weak axis
Pff.
I do remember the time when the Soviets refused to play Stalingrad because the Mkb was “too good”, even when they had tanks where you need to climb them in order to kill them as inf, which made me like the sole Soviet main during Stalingrad release.
But now the most useless Soviet Sf is “broken” and Soviets are unplayable? Ask the US main Normandy how they managed to survive this without PTSD.
Which effectively were whined to ground and remains there.
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
Il grant that kiraly is good, perhaps even best german gun. If we stretch this argument bit further it probably is better than PPSh. Only because it has more recoil, less rof and less ammo so you dont waste bullets like you do with norecoil PPSh ( SoViEt LoGiKC )
Mkb42 ? Its good but hardly worth of having sniper squad just because of it.
not need, you must throw explosive package upper frontal detail to destroy KV
And yes, mkb was 2OP on release of stalingrad and AVT was much worse then now
I play all stalingrad raiting event on soviets and was on leaderbord, somewhere between 10 and 20 position
I play in Normandy, take THUNDERBOLT and BROWNING and do with axis all what I want :))
Now yes, but on releause MG was PPSH with better damage, now MG is not good
Kiraly have more accuracy and damage, i use it on distance more then 100 metres, but ppsh became shit if enemy 20+ meteres
And recoil of Kiraly is 0 recoil, like PPSH, 1 perk and it became laser
i have and it is very usefull
How many times did they nerfed US and German equipment and how many times Soviet one?
So why are you talking about MG’s that could compete against ppsh/ppd over a year ago ?
Its pretty much same.
Thats true, probably because it has recoil and almost twice less mag size ?
PPsh has built in aimbot.
Are we competiting with bullshit claims now ?
Sure ive got it in some squads as well. But definitely not worth of taking a sniper squad just cause of mkb.
1 machine guns
2 mkb
1 machine guns
2 the nerf of AVS
3 the nerf of PPD
Hell, no, go to test it in polygon on semi-auto
bullshit
no recoil like PPSH, and more accuracy, it is important
I can kill anyone with kiraly on distance 0-150 metres, PPSH only 0-25 meters, wich better?
For me It’s worth
no yuo bullshit !1
Thats true.
I can kill people to 2km with ppsh so clearly ppsh is better.
Good for you then.
it should be always like this … cope my friend just like we axis have to cope agaisnt your stupid fuckin T-50 bullshit