but man i consider As-44 a better weapon im just joking about that ppsh-41 is considered better 
nice , me too also i got maxxed soviets in moscow so i know thing or two about their weaponry and i agree ppsh performes well in here but Ralin said it nicely i think
Japanese Heiho/PETA Madsen squad. the only good thing about the premium squad is that they wear all green and speaks in Indonesian
Werenāt you the one who was so excited for the bundle to buy it?
1 Like
There is no logic to snail whales.
1 Like
Guess youre not wrong m8
Wait i thought ENLiSTED is B3T4?
Till today i find nothing about Beta on Console but Forum say its beta. Iām confused
Its āBetaā but they sell overpriced premiums, so basically a cash grab
1 Like
Jumbo on Omaha beach
Stg-44, panzershrek, panther is stalingrad (I know itās currently replaced by pz4, but itās coming again in the next update)
Is-1 also in stalingrad
Gewehr 43 is also there
Ptrs penetrating tiger
I guess that canāt be called historical accuracy.
4 Likes
Yea the soviet theater isnt as historicaly accurate as the western front.
But the Battle of the bulge, Battle of Hurtgen forest, and Remagen are 100% historical.
The Normandy maps have a slight inaccuracy by having jumbos there.
But that is no where NEAR comparable to enlisted where common infantry weapons are fucking AVS, AVT, FG42, M2 carbine, MKB, jumbos in normandy, T50s in moscow and so on. Not to mention the maps arent fully historical like D-day for ex. HLL and enlisted with historical accuracy are not comparable
1 Like
So itās as historically accurate as enlisted. Mostly accurate weapons and vehicles, BUT.
And thatās mostly due to lack of content in HLL. Itās easier to be accurate if you have like 8 guns per side.
1 Like
Compare western front where HLL is mainly focused at.
Yeah no shit, because they didnt add non historical weapons?
But if you are seriously arguing that enlisted is as accurate than HLL than youre very wrong
1 Like
HLL literally has jumbo in normandy.
AVT is just a slightly modified SVT. That modernization could me made by literally any engineer.
HLL limits classes of soldiers, but not their weapons, so basically all soldiers classes who can carry FG-42 can use it in battle.
āCompare what I said!!!11ā
No, I will compare the whole game.
The historically accurate game is called Post Scriptum, ya know.
And if devs arenāt focused on eastern front at all, then why they added it?
Hmmm as if i didnt say that?
This gun was extremely rare, was unpopular, unreliable, but in enlisted is the standard infantry weapon of Berlin. Historically accurate
An FG42 can be equipped by 2 classes. Auto rifleman and Sniper.
There are only 2 snipers per game allowed, and only 1 auto rifleman per squad, and that adds up to an FG42 being one of the rarest weapons of HLL.
1 Like
Thatās also not accurate, since FG was paratrooperās weapon. It also hasnāt got mode selector, so itās only auto for rifleman and only semiauto for sniper.
Eastern front just sucks a lot more in HLL. Western front has more content, is also again the main focus, and it is 100% more historically accurate.
Hell HLL eastern front is more historically accurate than enlisted eastern front. You dont see everyone running around with AVTs/AVS/FGs/MKBs. Youll see an occasional STG, and a G43, and tanks are a lot rarer than in enlisted
1 Like
Well in HLL its very rare, in enlisted its one of the most common weapons. YUP HLL just as historically accurate as enlisted!1!!
1 Like
Again, if devs arenāt focused on it, then why they added it? To get some new players and then forget about them?
STG-44 and panzershrek in 1942
Panther in 1942
IS-1 as the MAIN HEAVY TANK in 1942 (only a few were produced in 1943 btw)
Again, PTRS penetrating tigers (and should I talk about whole tank damage model and penetration system?)
Yes. Itās not historically accurate, which is the same phrase that Iāll say about enlisted.