So I was looking at the stats of the Bren Mk 2 and comparing them to the Bren Mk 1.
From what I looked at the Mk 2 was a direct downgrade from the Mk 1. However the Bren Mk 2 is later in the tech tree. I know that just because something is tier two doesn’t mean that its better than something in tier one but that’s usually the case.
So I haven’t unlocked the Mk 2 yet, but I’m wondering if the Mk 2’s sights are less obstructive? I looked at the 3d model and it doesn’t seem to be the case, but I’m just curious.
Slightly better sights, but they’re still hideous af
Bren mk2:
Bren mk1:
3 Likes
Thanks for the help, I’ll just keep using hte Mk1
funnily enough, mk1 has a very very slightly better dispersion and faster reload (but only if mag isnt fully emptied). Meaning, it is superior stat wise :PP. But the difference is pretty much unrecognizable.
Wait a minute, I think the photo you put for the Bren Mk 1 is the vickers-berthier. But again, thanks for the help, I’ll keep using the Mk 1
ohh, you are right xD I fixed it. And it looks like mk2 has even worse sights than mk1.
btw. mk1 costs 1500 and mk2 costs 3000
1 Like
They’re both top mag Red Coat garbage. Mk I was in Tunisia and Mk II was in Normandy
That’s about the best I’ve ever managed to do with the thing. Sure, it hits like every other LMG, but man between the RoF, recoil, and sights it is only outclassed in suckage by the Madsen. Shoot both are pretty darn similar. Only good for 2-3 round burst at close-mid range. Glorified semi auto for long range. Top loaded mag. Offset sights. The works
For reference here’s probably my best Madsen run
