The gray zone is a complete joke.
It’s the reason 50% of tanks are complete garbage, flankers like m18 can do nothing.
2 Likes
How about you ask the devs to buff tank survivability against infantry instead of nerfing it again and again instead? If that isnt fixed first there is no point for tanker to leave the grey zone or he just dies instantly. But I guess that would be OP again…
2 Likes
there are 4 (5) counters to enemy tanks in gray zone:
- tank
- plane
- AT soldier with either AT rifle or rocket launcher
- AT canon built by engineer
with 5th being HMG that can pen some lower tier tanks
only exception to this is current US on BR5 cause it doesnt have tanks, bazookas and AT canon that can frontally pen KT. well maybe japan has problem with jumbo (idk i didnt play it post merge).
Simple, make bigger maps.
my bad 
lol blaming this problem solely to explosive pack. You and reaper are just anti explosive pack people that like to blame problem on explosive pack.
Many players don’t leave the grey zone simply because you can farm kill more effectively.
It is due to camping at back usually gives you better view in most of the objectives point and you don’t need to turn your turret/ vehicle much to attack enemy.
Is explosive pack one of the reasons why players stay in grey zone? Yes, but it is same with other weapons. Even if we remove explosive pack we still have a bunch of stuff to counter tank like at weapon , Molotov, tnt, at mine. Their tank will still get destroyed by those weapon and choose to stay in the grey zone again.
Moreover, don’t forget that many players complaining about the grey zone tank because it is hard to penetrate it from the front. You really think those tank will leave the grey zone only to expose their weak side armor?
2 Likes