that honestly makes no sense as they probably did not fight for the werhmarcht and women were not used as front line troops.
I hate the fact that historical games are now feeling forced into putting “equality” into there games like oh there must be a black man there must be an asian man and there must be women (even though they didn’t fight on the front lines during those specific conflicts.
People are quite honestly going mad and too far with this equality thing.
Its the 21st century if not everyone gets offended over silly little things nowadays its childish most of younger generation are now snowflakes.
The next battlefield game there will be these genders:
Female
Male
Non binary
Transgender
Other
Hermaphrodite
Femboy
Trap
Reverse Trap
Alien
Agender
Gender fluid
Not really too sure i want to be all of the above
And finally the colors you can have your character will be:
White
Black
Brown
Yellow
Blue
Shrek green
Pink
Rainbow
Neon green
The black soilders almost didnt seen combat and only few of them was sended to the frontline at the end of the war in europe but in africa too most of the africans was maded trenches and etc.
Also, black soldiers in the US military were segregated at that time (WWII). So you would need a squad made of colored soldiers only. That could be an idea for a premium squad. But having random colored soldiers in default squads or from silver orders would not be realistic.
They aren’t forced to do anything. They simply are incapable of doing proper historical/realistic campaigns so they resort to using “ah, it isnt supposed to be realistic, just inclusive”.
It’s simpler for the company and developers, so it makes more money.
And money is what companies want, a good product would at best be a byproduct.
Source: Wikipedia
The all-Black segregated 93rd Infantry saw combat on Bougainville, in the Pacific, on the Kuma and East-West trails, but did not see combat in Europe. They fought mainly in the Pacific.
