i have no problem about semi autos for the soviets. they’re nothing special. but soviets bolt action is far better compared to the germans counterpart. yea mannlicher is good but the stock mosin is better imo
Imo Kar is much better than any Mosin, it has nice sights, can kill anything and has pretty good rof. Mosins are not bad in any means, but i will always chosse Kar instead of any Mosin. Mannlicher is good too, especially with good bolt reload perk.
The “only Allies suffer and Df is Axis biased” crap is a myth created by the Democrats… eh mean the Yankee with hat so he can get his Korea-War Jackson and Super-Pershings.
Where they also nerfed the MP43 in terms of dmg while giving the Soviets the Fed Avtom and giving the Soviets the DT, which more less kills the MG advantage in Moscow?
true. simillar in stalingrad i somehow missed every shot while using the k98k, but hit every target with mannlicher. this does not apply to the kar98k the g41 also have simillar issue.
I thought the g43 in normandy are kinda odd until i tried the g41
I actually prefer German bolt actions over soviet ones since the Soviets one has questionable sights but good pull time or bad pull time and good sights. Mauser also does more damage than the 7.62R with both full length rifles dealing 16 and 15 damage respectively while the Carbine versions of these guns deal 14 and 13
Meh, dt29 beats the mg34, and the Kiraly cannot beat the ppsh41. The recoil is too high, even in Moscow, so it must be used in burst fire fashion. So you should write:
Well. My mistake. I thought here you answered with this to the other post. My bad.
Well… I cant remember that they nerfed the PPD dmg as well. I just remembered that the Kar98k and the Pre-War used to do more dmg before OBT. But then both changes are not really notable in combat… at least for me. I just dislike the rifle nerf because I think this was once again based on “stats”.