And would that be a bad thing? Just folder it with panther a. If you dont wanna use it you arent forced to. Otherwise we can entirely remove half or the games content because they arent meta
ok i will also stay with my point
fr why we should I use thompson 50 whem i can use thompson 100
i have an idea. it was m4a5e8 (2+3=5) it has body from a3, engine from a2 and turret from a3
Thats not how it works. M4 means sherman, a2 means engine, e8 means the suspension, 76 means cannon and w means wet ammo. They have same hull and turret
ok irl it was M4a2e8 but in film it was representing M4a3e8 because M4a2e8 were send to usrr
1 Like
I agree Enlisted is WWII game at the moment.
I fully support doing WWII campaigns properly.
However in the future I see zero reason why Korea shouldnt be added. Remember, like 95% of Korean War weaponry was WWII era.
Personally Id do WWII + Korean War. That’s it. No further.
If people want Vietnam or Afghanistan or whatever that would be Enlisted 2.
Excactly
1 Like
bro of you want jungle wargare you have pacific and birma, if you want desert warfare you have tunezia, you have got evry thing you want in this game YOU DONT NEED “OTHER” MAPS TO FEEL OTHER VIBES
also there are a lot of vietnam gemes such as cod
Korea should also be in an Enlisted 2.0, Let this game only stay with the WW2 era
Lol
There should be no Enlisted 2.0. Just like there’s no WT 2.0 or WoT 2.0.
Making seperate 2.0 version of live service game is Activision level BS.
*105 howitzer