It’s literally just a class designation.
Not all squads that are guerrilas class are actual guerillas.
And not all paras in the game has para class.
Is that a problem?
No it isn’t, it literally only bothers the nitpickers who want to brag about it not being accurate. As if they’re the only smart ones to recognize it.
Following it with the completely fictitious argument that some imaginary dummy could have gotten it wrong and be completely confused because of it.
Yeah, exaxtly. I feel so much better than everybody else because I like when things follow a pattern and are intuitive.
What a pile of BS.
So these guys want to call trucks Unarmoured Personnel Carriers?
“Deploying on UPC”
“UPC coming up on Objective 2”
“enemy UPC spotted”
hmm no, Im not really vibing with this.
I guess they want this class to be called “mobile rally point”, lol.
It could be called “transport vehicle”.
Shame it isn’t as cool as “APC”.
Though imo naming pattern is secondary to making some rules to why some vehicles are and some are not APCs/spawns/whatever.
Like M16 vs SdKfz251/9. Just why?
Hey you’re not necessarily wrong. But neither are the folks calling out the discrepancy.
It’s definitely no big deal at all.
10/10 post would read again.
ive spammed marked the props multiple times to make sure they arent apc/tanks before
That’s true. I was quite triggered and very overdramatic. I apologize for that lmao.
Hey no worries. I do appreciate that though.