It could be a good alternative to the panzer 3 N
2 Likes
I don’t know about BR II. BR III surely, but II? I’d question that choice
3 Likes
Rather BR3.
80mm armor, 105mm howitzer and a mg34 on top. Slightly worse then the Sherman with 105mm (it has a coaxial mg) which also is BR3.
A down size would be the lack of a turret, but that could be compensated with additional HEAT rounds for anti tank engagements.
10 Likes
Stuh is definitely br 3 material. But i would want to see sturmpanzer 2 in br 2.
It has 150 mm cannon but it is open top and has no mg + paper armour. It would be fun to use in moscow
8 Likes
A great counter balance to the T19 HMC I may add
it does not have any mgs
but yes.
br III should be
as it goes, should be easy to port over due to being in the editor already:
2 Likes
It had a mg34 on top, later variants had a remote controlled mg34 (like that one on the Hetzer).
Many sources say that 26 HE and 10 HEAT rounds were loaded.
Penetration:
Gr. 39 Hl/B = 105mm
Gr. 39 Hl/C = 115mm
4 Likes
well. the enlisted version does not.
Then it should have one.
3 Likes
It does, its just not usable, same for the Premium Stug.
no.
it’s not actually modeled.
it doesn’t have controls either.
maybe it will change ( although, it’s unlikely )
Well the MG itself is missing - yes, but the MG shield is actually there, so it shouldn’t be difficult to actually add the MG.
1 Like
Yes it should.