This is pretty bad choice for now becouse we have no other way to select what we wanna play !!..
Becouse we are still lab rats and Gajin needs us to play everything to test all the stuff !!
If they give us option now we would not be playing conquest at all and it would be filled with bots like Lone fighters !
I understand people who just quit when placed in conquest maps as more than offten they are boring and not that much fun as invasion maps !
Too grind-dependent game to make me waste time on matches where I get less than 1k xp/min. And after 200 hours in the game, you begin to understand such things after just a minute of the battle.
Therefore, my winrate is about 90% for all the factions that I played (except Germany in Normandy before the fixes, where I believed in my teams until the last)
So you seen it all, huh noobcakes. I have gotten the same fucking map same mission 14 times in a row before asshat. so STFU and quit crying.
And FPS been out since 1990ās and mid 90ās on the PC. Medal of honor was the first good fps on PC. and this game is basically a upgraded version of that older game.
Blockquote
Nah, a way to stop this is having human being players playing the videogame and not troglodites that quit games 24/7 because they dont like the map, the mode, the team is losing after 30 secs, and more kiddo things
Blockquote
Then stop bitching about people leaving. little wuss.
2 Likes
Maybe if Conquest was a game mode worth playing I wouldnāt back out of Conquest games. The only reason I leave games is bc itās either a shitty conquest map or itās just a crappy, one sided map. A time ban is just so stupid, but we should all listen to you since you seem to know what everyoneās best interests are. Maybe instead of getting mad at the players you should ask the devs why people are leaving games, thereās a saying that goes ādonāt hate the player, hate the game.ā
2 Likes
Conquest ruins the experience
1 Like
Agreed
Thereās already a penalty when you leave mid-game. Forcing people to play certain maps that they donāt like can ruin their enjoyment of the game. Imagine having a battle task where you have to get flamethrower kills, and you get Swamps of Reviers over and over again? It would be annoying as hell, but at least you could requeue to hopefully get a map where you can actually enjoy the game.
ye like i said we are still gajin little lab rats that are not allowed to pick what we want to play so we test ,balance ,fix all of their shit !
Funny and true , gotta suck to play axis loool such wehraboo kiddos !!!. while we Soviets we fight hard untill the end even on conquest maps we hate xd !!!
Conquest is trash, because all it takes is a spawn point at A or C, while all the stormtroopers rush B and lose
1 Like
I quite enjoy some conquest maps, so I donāt agree with you. But I understand itās not for everyone.
On the other hand, in invasion mode if defenders were given a 30 seconds āpreparation timeā while they bring up the barbed wire, sandbags etc. but blocked by temporary grey zone next to first objective, and attackers are allowed after this preparation time to enter the battle zone, that 30 seconds would already be enough to sort out who gonna stay and who is leaving due to game mode, and maybe replaced by other players. (As well as allowing time to load assets on slow computers.)
I donāt see how this same setup would be feasible for conquest maps. Maybe right after start youād rush from further away, and first 30 secondās task is to reach and unlock the regular spawn point. This spawn unlocking thing could work for other cases as well - e.g. the weird event when defenders are still around as attackers start to spawn in a new spawn point, with spawn protection. If attackers need to reach and control spawn zones, thatās more in line with what is expected. ā¦Well I fear it would probably not work better than now, but if anyone has ideas how to improveā¦
A way to select the preferred and disliked maps and game modes, or possibility to select from currently running games is probably better than immediately punishing early leavers.
Thatās right, they said something about adding selective game modes. I prefer long drawn out games like Red Orchestra and the like. Some people are the opposite.
1 Like
Nah
If my team is playing like a bunch of plants and Iām the only one trying, Iām not fucking putting myself through that.
If an enemy is playing the most scummy ways Iām not subjecting myself to that either. He can have his win if heās going to play the part as the most unenjoyable opponent.
9 Likes
->Have my shit absolutely shoved in for a match and have absolutely zero fun
->Get the same shitty maps over and over
->nearly rip my fucking hair out because Iām getting so angry.
->Some shitter says n-noooo you cant leave! you gotta take all the bullshit so I can have fun!
Fuck off.
11 Likes
yea im not gonna debate against a guy camping C with his ārally pointā thatās not even a competition, its a scummy trick and the funny thing is, Iām one of the first guys to use that tactic in cbt
1 Like
oh you poor old man!!
FUCKING HEAR HEAR, AMEN TO THAT
Its a shame that games are moving away from enjoyment and more towards stress
2 Likes
There already is a penalty, you lose 30% of your earnings if you desert.
If you want any more penalties youāre probably getting into a very shady area where people whoāve paid real life money could sue because now they cannot play the bloody game theyāve paid for.
1 Like
Itās not a real problem if youāre high level already, haha
Great, so punish the players who are most likely to continue playing, but may quit when pushed! Nothing can go wrong with that!
The two most important playerbases in a game is the old blood, and the newest players. Try to not annoy either of those groups.
2 Likes