It was planned to start production in August 1945. According to the information,It would have several types of warheads, and its penetration would also exceed 400mm, even more than the 320mm of the Panzerfaust 150.
No point unless you will increase itâs muzzle velocity. You really need Panzerfaust 60 to destroy greyzone
KV-1 spammers otherwise grb-39 will be just a better at weapon than your faust 30.
Yeah but GRB-39 canât pen KV-1 reliably even though itâs only BR III. Panzerfaust 30 would eliminate that issue entirely.
KV-1 is so overbuffed that it can survive multiple tnt and demo packs unlike King Tiger, you need to hit ultra specific spots to kill it. It deserves a big nerf especially since itâs also can use binoculars and shoot people at high distances while also having short reload as unlike weaker T-34 it has dedicated loader.
Why do you mean by âonly BR3â? We are speaking about BR2 AT weapon.
Btw. The real context is that you are speaking of most armored heavy tank of its BR.
But I get it. Letâs just make concept of armor completely meaningless.
But to be clear. I donât care if pfaust 30 will make it into the game as BR2.
But it is definitely going to be just another completely unnecessary powercreep that will make GrB and sturmpistols obsolete in almost every way (GrB would still at least have a bigger ammo reserve, but thatâs it).
How is it fair to pit a tank with 75mm all around against AT âriflesâ that can barely reliably pen over 40mm (which is exactly the top armour on a KV-1). Either bring Panzerfaust 30 in or uptier KV-1, which I donât ever see happening.
I have no clue what are you even talking about. Penetration values of both of these weapons are much higher.
Whatever
Due to the armour being sloped, the effective pen becomes around 40mm.
And then youâll keep crying about those SMGs and body armor, Iâd rather fix the German SMGs than give them something powerful elsewhere.
reasonable
What about making it an equivalent to Anti tank impact mine Ni 05?