So? The cannon can kill tanks effectively and also strafe infantry but it aint nothing compared to 10 hvars that can easily clear the entire team. You also get bomb that can kill any tank in the game.
Also the speed of 262 would not benefit it in enlisted. It would fly over the entire map before it could do much damage.
Iād think the Fw190F-8 would be a better add for the german mains complaining about the Thunderbolt, as would the addition of bombs/suspended armaments on numerous German Tier III fighters;
that is if youāre actually interested in correcting the supposed probelms.
I would like a 190 Flight model fix before more 190s though 
But yes, ācanā carry 14 rockets and 500kg bomb
true, though I think a general investigation into the question of āis torque actually being modelled correctlyā on all planes would be good too;
after all the P-47 had a lot of torque at full throttle, (but then again a lot of mass and a lot of room for aerodynamic compensation especially at the higher range of itās speeds)ā¦ thing was enormousā¦
We dont need multiple new machine guns and multiple new semi autos for the allies.
It is unimportant how big the map is, it is more important that the axis FINALY after months gets a nice vehicle again that even can bring a big punch direct in the bedroom of those US fanboys.
That thing flew, ~1450 were built, that thing has pros and cons ā lets go.
So funny when the US mains rocket spam since ever and when their counterpart maybe can get a plane that can bring the spam back to them they just say ānAh wE dOnT nEeD ThaTā. US mains are just silly.
I agree ā¦ the Stinger wasnāt needed ā¦ is it nice ā¦ sureā¦ is it crazy with 200 rounds ā¦ yes in fact Iāve seen that it actually was tested with 200 ā¦ but was actually used with 100 ā¦ I think it shouldāve had 100 ā¦ The T20 was somewhat needed to deal with the Type Hei Auto. The M2 Carbine just isnt sufficient ā¦ its closer to a stg honestly ā¦ and as such I would support moving it to an assaulter weapon.
The FG42 II SHOULD get a buff ā¦ both in the ability to go auto default (in general you should have what your default is set to auto on all appliable guns imo) and better falloff / damage dropoff. If the model has a bayonet lug ā¦ a bayonet should be doable as well (not sure if all models had one off the top of my head.
I think there SHOULD be a MG42 100 Round Field Mod event weapon (where they linked two 50ās together).
I just disagree ā¦ I can just see it being used as a pseudo guided missile that is fast enough where it wouldnt really be counterable ā¦ I donāt think that would be good gameplay. We already somewhat see this with the pacific not having a delay in where planes can spawn ā¦ meaning if you donāt immediately build AA ā¦ you can often get blasted ā¦ and sometimes you still get blasted.
2 months ago USA was hell to play against both Japan and Germany due to playerpase stacking. Playerbase shifts need to be addressed. As for an axis vehicle ā¦ I would argue that the KTH is still top of the hill when it comes to tanks. and I would agree that bomb loads need to be added and improved to a LOT of high BR planes for axis.
Examples I could see and would support:
Fw190 F-8 (note the F and G series were designated as Ground Attack version of the 190 ā¦ we have 0 of them in game).
Fw 190 A3/U2 Had 3 rockets per wing
Just to be clear ā¦ Iām not a main of any faction ā¦ I play everything as evenly as possible because thatās what I like to do.
Also note, Iām in favor of decreasing the absurd amount of HVARs on the P47 from 10 ( I do think it is too many) and the AP-4C.
No, lol
Sure the KT(H) is great, but there always is a way to destroy it. Same goes to KV1 when I face it with my BRII equipment. Hard to kill, but possible. It dont need to be a new vehicle for the axis, an new (and NOT nerfed) firearm would be great too. Fact is, the axis didnāt get new and nice stuff since months.
This gun was one of the finest out there, the āauto modeā should sure be standard and a bayonet optional. I wonāt call it a buff - just āget your sh*t together and give 'em historical statsā.
There should first be a regular MG34 and MG42 with 100rds MINIMUM in the tech tree.
I totally agree, the F-series was great and well needed!
I didnāt mean you in person, I mean the real cry babies (both US and USSR). There are plenty of them, supported by the ānon-existingā bias.
It has same 250kg bomb as IAR-12C, and yet that plane is 2 times better than P-40E-1, Like I did dogfight against it and the IAR-12C won by outmaneuvering my max upgraded P-40E-1.
Good!
You can avoid it by diving from 1200 feet and pull up when you are reaching 700 feet
Definitely would be awesome. The Russians can turn every soldier into a machine gunner, and the US has, now, two different heavy tanks that have missiles. The Germans could really use some of the advanced technology, that in reality they did invent, after all. Letās also not forget that th Americans just get the super Pershing in the research tree, now, even though only a single version existed and never actually saw action. There isnāt any reason to exclude the Me 262, as it did actually see limited production AND action. German BR ranks for most of their assault rifles and tanks are at least one tier too high, anyhow.
ānever saw actionā
you do realize that the S.pershing has a confirmed kill on a germany TD right? and itās photo of it was in germany at a tank dump in june 1945 while the war in asia was going on
I realize that it was used a single time. Hardly justifies it being in the research tree instead of being an event unlock. You do realize the Me 262 actually did see production, right? Not to mention more actual missions.
oh i know, i am just saying that S.pershing was actually fielded like the german prototype Panzer 3B that we have in the TT.
though i donāt think it would be good due to the nature of the jet on these small maps
It would be fun, though, and would probably suffer in the game, as in real life, from going Too fast. The 8,8 cm Flak 37 sfl., GAZ-MM (72-K), M13 GMC, and Flakpanzer I are oddball vehicles that are more fun than they are effective, and Iād definitely throw some cash down for more oddball aircraft. Right now, the only oddballs coming to mind are the Fw 189 A-1 and the Hs 129 B-3. I honestly donāt believe an Me 262 would be game-breaking if they just chose the most balanced variant to throw into BR 5. Personally, since the Russians and Americans were both given tanks that can easily tackle the largest Tiger, Iāve stopped playing BR 5 altogether and have gravitated towards BR 2.
I think it will come, probably a premium. They would be missing too big a cash oppurtunity for something so iconic.
I dont share the same reservations about it being bad. I think it will be really fun/good. 2x 30mm (35 rounds each) on Premium G-10/G-14 are insanely fun.
4x 30mm (90 rounds each) will be another level of fun.
I havenāt seen anybody else with the crosses swords yet, so I am definitely among the most experienced players in the game. I donāt expect that to mean a whole lot, other than Iām not some noob asked me for the game to change. Iām invested and would like to maximize fun.
No
