IDK what the issue is with adding balanced CAS in Tunisia, but I might as well try to remind the devs that the Ju 88 exists, in fact; there were 15183 of them. They also happened to be used in Africa, unlike the G.55 (don’t get me wrong, I could look at that beast all day). Anyway, the loadout I propose is 4 × 250 kg SC250JA bombs + 10 × 50 kg SC50JA bombs (1500 kg total).
G55 is a fighter that use fighter slot.
So does the Bf 110 C-7, and it is much better. Either way, there is no axis plane that matches the effectiveness of either the Beaufighter Mk X, or A-20G-25.
NO, BF110C7 still use attacker squad.
Squad is attacker, slot is fighter, hence you see it alongside the Ju 87, unless they changed it this update.
I don’t understand the reasoning of this statement; yes, it does have bombs, but contrary to the update post, the two 100 kg bombs will not let you “terrorize” the ground.
You can’t compare a fighter with cas in terms of ground attack capability right? So there is no point of comparing G55 with A20.
Exactly, hence we complain that they added it instead of adding a counter to the allied CAS.
I mean you can’t complain why dev didn’t add balanced cas when G55 is just a fighter.
Sometimes dev will add different thing for different side on same level of campaign.
Moreover, this is the first fighter in Tunisia that have bomb.
The BF110C7 using fighter slot thing is probably a bug.
That is the issue itself.
Yes, doesn’t mean it is wise. They should add what improves the game, not what they think is cool.
Yeah, that’s great, but it’s only 2 × 100 kg. FYI there will soon premium planes with bombs (P-40E-1, and Re. 2001 CN).
Don’t think so, as both Bf 110 variants in Moscow use the fighter slot. IIRC, the C-7 variant in Moscow used to occupy an attacker slot when it was added, but was “fixed” to use the fighter slot.
Axis get a better fighter , what is the problem?
How is it related to campaign level?
That can mean the bf110c7 itself have bug.
It was changed to use the fighter slot doesn’t mean it is intended. There used to be a bug of p38 using attacker slot, it takes very long time for dev to finally fix that.
The fact that they get a fighter after getting the short end of the stick twice with CAS. It would’ve been fine if they added a better fighter for the allies too; such as a Mustang or early Typhoon.
It isn’t, just wanted to throw that in there to point out the power-creep.
Pretty sure it was, I’ll see if I can find the changelog.
They will probably let axis get cas and allies get fighters on later level, just like Normandy.
Good luck on finding it. I don’t it is intended, since no other thing in game receive similar treatment. Other Plane that use the slot that is not same as squad was fixed. Soldier that can equip other weapon was fixed. So I don’t think bf110c7 is anything special to have privileges.
I hope so, it’s just that they should have done something about the Beaufighter since people have been complaining about it.
Yeah, I have to admit that I cannot find it.
Ju-88 should be in all campaigns with Germany, should it not?
It had a variant for pretty much every mission type
Including carrying underbelly guns for anti-shipping and what not
I don’t think it needs both the 250kgs and the 50kgs, one or the other is probably fine. The playerbase will probably do better with the 4x250s, so let’s go with that.
i want the big fuck you gun variant
I want to see it added with 28 x 50 kg SC50JA bombs (1,400 kg total) xD.
If they’d drop together like all bombs do, it’d be about as effective of a bombload as the A-20 in Normandy has. But we would need a bit more lethality than that to counter the rocket madness IMO.
As someone who plays on Tunisia a lot, though admittedly mostly Allies side, I could perhaps get behind this, however, the amount of firepower would need to be toned down a little bit. Give it either the 4x 250s, OR the 10x 50s. You gotta consider how much firepower that alone is. One or the other, just not both.