Although the current TT apc do work, I’m honestly disappointed that the more Icon ones are lock behind a paywall (shocker) but I believe that these apc would prove more reliable and more convenient for the battlefield.
Germany
The apc I introduced to you is the sd.Kfz.251/1.
now before those who bought the premium one complain, the version I’m introducing is the Ausf C version, while the Premium one is the D version. Clearly different from comparing them.
Now, what do you guy’s, gal’s, anime women, sentient tanks and planes, and animals (WHICH INCLUDES SNAILS) think?
(Yes I will make another when I feel like it and do some more research)
16 Likes
The Ausf.C
The Ausf.C (late 1941) was also very similar, but introduced a new flat engine nose plate, 14.5 mm (0.57 in) thick, without an access trap, replaced by a simple hole for the manifold. Other minor mass-production simplifications included the rear access doors. Attention was also paid to the engine, with the removal of the front hood cooling grid and the lateral access traps, replaced by large open ventilation boxes, and the lower part of the hull was modified to increase the compartment draw. The rear muffler storage boxes were relocated to the rear, and the mufflers themselves were completely modified. The rearview mirror was relocated from the driver side vision slit to a lower position. The headlights were now fixed directly to the chassis and the bumpers removed and replaced by towing hooks. Production for 1941 is assumed to be 389 vehicles. However, an increase in production was urgently needed, but by 1942 these figures rose only to 424 and around 1200 for 1942. Unit cost was 22,560 DM.
The Ausf.D
This version was introduced in the spring of 1943 as a set of small changes in design for mass-production. The previous versions, also known as the “Alte” (around 4650 from June 1939 to September 1943) included the A, B and C, but the Ausf.D, also known as “Neue” was different, and 10,602 were built by Hanomag, MNH, Schichau Wumag, Weserhätte, Borgward, Evans+Pistor, Deutsche Werke and Büssing-NAG between 1943 and ’45. The modifications included many changes in production design. The number of armored panels was reduced from 19 to 9, permanent stowage boxes with padlocked access traps were added, replacing the former rear mufflers. Simple vision slits, simple flat engine hood panels with relocated air intakes under the hull, simplified reverse sloping rear end with flat door panels and many other minor modifications allowed the simplification of construction while offering the same protection, and it was far less labor-intensive. A feet of engineering required in times of increasing Allied bombings and exhausting metal supplies. However, the internal configuration was unchanged since the Ausf.C, and the FuG Spr Ger f radio was still in use. By this stage in the war, the Ausf.D was more and more required for ad hoc modifications and conversions due to a dramatic increase in the need of fire support platforms of all kind. 
4 Likes
I’m honoured that you included me this time.
7 Likes
Some times it takes multiple mistakes to get it right.
1 Like
I was thinking the M3a1 half-track could be the U.S equivalent to the sd.Kfz.251/1 Ausf C.
1 Like
JUST JERKING YOURE chain Germany already has the best tech tree apc, but yeah half tracks with and mg or not would be good apc only we would need to move apcs to br1 remove the mg slot and put half tracks at br2 then maybe kangaroo at br3 with a reduced crew 4 and
with a crew between a full apc and the kangaroo/uc
2 Likes
I made thia post with the intention that the sd.Kfz.251/1 ausf C would have an MG, as well as all other’s I’m planning on making
I agree with this.
I think thia might work.
Then It would be A t-34-57 with extra armor.
1 Like
As much as I want this as a German staple as it was in real life, Darkflow would have to put usage rules in place. Others like this (armoured half tracks and such that have weapons on the TT) wind up taking a tank slot so a faction could only have 2 in play at once. Armed and armoured APCs would be a nightmre to the opposing team if they didn’t have restrictions. If the Germans could spawn 2 tanks and a handfull of these at the same time it literally becomes Blitzkrieg rolling over objectives in seconds.
1 Like
with infantry that can be killed by
at rifles and engineer mg nests
1 Like
BUT acts as extra armor when hit my a tank shell.
an cease to be an apc and become a tank, but maybe br4 sorry got excited been a long time since someone posted it, side gunners also look considerably thinner than normal armor.
1 Like
The inclusivity is appreciated
1 Like
Don’t worry, I try to include everyone. Even if I forget them accidentally.
1 Like
I cant remember where, but I did think I found a list of solid options for everyone to have actual TT APCs.
The Ausf C ofc for germany works well.
The Soviets I think should get the M3A1 Scout Car, which honestly is an iconic “soviet” weapon.
The Japanese have so many options at this point its not even funny.
And the US… Well I mean pick a number and put a M before it, and its probably a half track of some descript.
1 Like
Which do you think should be add in your opinion?
My question is: Why doesn’t Germany have normal trucks?
Why with just the halftracks?
4 Likes
Cause they’re cooler then trucks Mr. Muppet.
1 Like
bestow this upon russia with the troops on the outside if the hull
i think the troop compartment has less armor than a halftack 
"smekalka ‘succeeding’