About the penetration of the t-28

[Knyaz_Iaroslav]

T-28 was nerf 1-2 months ago.
Early he can one shot every germany tank… How and pz 4e every soviet.

[Conscript_Joe]

Do not worry, we can unlock the full star t-50 from lvl1 with a gold order. It’s the best tank of Moscow, much better than the last pz3 (good 50mm canon but so slow, with very bad anti infantry capability)

I think the pz4 armour model got nerfed too a while back it used to bounce Soviet shells easily, but I find it very easy to pen nowadays. Maybe they did so to compensate? I’m just sad they didn’t say anything about it…

[US_Matt_LT]

I have the T50 but im still using my fully upgraded BT7. Love that tank. The speed and the daster turret traverse makes it better for my agressive flanking tactics than the T50. T50 is when you want to barely move and just stay there. But respect for using the T26 comrade!

[Knyaz_Iaroslav]

After all, the t50 is not the t28.

It is not clear to me why they, together with the return of the old damage HE, broke the armor effect of conventional shell?

I need 1.5 lvl for unlock t50.

[_mortebianca]

Yeah but still putting a tank too powerful and putting a patch on it replacing one type of shell is stupid.

[Knyaz_Iaroslav]

BT 7 best tank in the game.
Fast and powerfull.

[Enlisted_Thunder]

Just replaced the T-28's Shrapnel. It's so buggy!

https://streamable.com/jm4a9x I bet I have met more bugged situation than this one, which I am lucky that this PZ2C gives me enough time to shoot and found out the shrapnel in this case, also possible other cases, just do no damage. In other situations, I just got wiped out when shooting Panzers but got no damage with the shrapnel. Also in WT, players just don’t use T-28’s Shrapnel. They all use the proper AP shell instead. [image] [image] And due to the poor penetration, Shrapnel isnt good…

Why not give proper AP shell to T-28? Yeah, no KV1/T-34, but now Soviet lose its advantage in tank side!

Now, German get PZ4E, a proper tank for the battle. But the Soviet only get a outdated T-28, and even worse, with the nonsense Shrapnel shell. In WT, players NEVER use that kind of shell, but quickly upgraded to a proper AP shell. The shrapnel here is also useless. Please give Soviet some compensate for not having proper tanks. T-28 in WT: Default trash shell: [image] The shell that players normally use: [image] Shrapnel only get 30mm peneltration! In opposite, PZ4E get proper AP shell,…

Shrapnel has serious issues in this game. It sometimes can even penetrate my PZ3J, sometimes even fails at a PZ2C.

Also, PZ4E is the most balanced tank in this game. Decent AT and AP ability with decent armor. But Soviet’s T-28 is only capable of AP, and T50 is mostly pure AT. Making the Moscow campaign “in contrary to” the history–where Soviet should get very OP tanks.

[Knyaz_Iaroslav]

Then it could destroy an enemy tank in case of penetration.Now we need 2-3 breakthroughs.
So shrapnel can either be changed or damage returned.
In general, I agree with you.

[CaptainSebekel]

@sfh0525

the history–where Soviet should get very OP tanks

But those were tanks which are not ingame (yet).

[GeneralBrus]

something went wrong with the tanks on the moscow campaign, the T28 was really nasty to deal with, now its just a joke. All that while the Panzer IV is still wrecking tanks, even tho it should be a support tank → good vs infantry, and yeah to make things worse, the panzer IV seems to be even better at killing tanks than the new Panzer III.

[ghostofishmael]

Thread was started by some slavaboo crying that he can no longer one clap lolpen german tanks

yeah dude, german players are such crybabies lmao