Здарова. У меня как у новичка созрел вопрос я начал качать кампанию битва за Москву, но учитывая новую систему древа пока условный чел качающий берлин ездит со мной на том же уровне на ис2 а я на т 34 л11 и после обновы он с более крутой техникой
А если брать во внимание оружие то конец один и тот же
Вопрос: что мне качать за советов что бы я не остался с бт 5 против тигра
I’m just seriously impressed you keep reading through all of this.
Hats off to you.
Well… it’s our duty to collect and read our players feedback c:
Make tech tree bypassing, speeding up stuff you already unlocked in other campaigns.
Make better campaigns with less copy+paste.
T-50 sucks and helped to kill Moscow.
Make better campaigns with less copy+paste and simply remove the Fed.
Will still be there.
Make better campaigns with less copy+paste.
Make tech tree bypassing, speeding up stuff you already unlocked in other campaigns.
Refund?
We didn’t get even appropriate mechanism of new MM
No, I mean, I’m not interested in some classes even if they are unique.
Other tank
So now even nades will get BR?
So no I dont wanna grind same stuff again but I also dont wanna grind unique stuffß Huh
It have sense
I have gold order one
Why not? This is high-tier equipment (WP)
With tree system I can always choose what to grind. Right now I’m forced to research things like mortarmen.
So? Its part of the free campaign level.
Pfff One WT grenade, now you can face Tigers with Stuart and SDB. Have fun. Totally gonna work.
My point was that the tech tree should come but just be separated from campaigns apart from rewarding players if they already unlocked something.
Why not to move it to level 25?
Idk. Ask the devs though I dont know how high levels will automically get a thing high BR.
In case it’s not too late, here’s a bit from me:
What i am concerned about is:
1.) Lack of historical accuracy
I like variation between the campaigns, with time-appropriate equipment and vehicles.
I would really ask you to separate out early and late war campaigns. Give us some chance to vary the experience. If i need to manually adjust squads every time i want to try to play not top tier, then this is not a great solution. You can then use the same system in the western front as well.
2.) Repetitiveness
Right now i play different campaigns because i encounter different equipment, and i have different equipment. I fear that with the way match making is described, i will be pretty much facing the same enemy equipment no matter what with 0 incentive to use anything except meta. Particularly when fighting as the allies against germans. Not sure how long this will stay interesting, “ooh look a king tiger and panther again”.
3.) Lack of choice in the experience
I choose moscow when i actively don’t want to fight in an urban hellscape. If you group the campaigns together, then i have a very high probability to wind up playing city maps on the eastern front. This is just not that much fun or appealing to me.
Everything depends on the details of implementation, but fearing for the worst i am not at all excited about the changes.
The more i follow the discussion, the more i losing hope. I fled from WT and Battlefield 5. And i am sure lots of fellow comrades did the same. We found a new promising home here in Enlisted. And now we see the implementation of the same bullshit mechanics from WT and the same bullshit in terms of history from Battlefield 5 lurking at the near future. Instead of first do more promotion, fixing erros, and just implement a play all campaign, all sides option, they abandon the soul of the game. Hopefully i am wrong and we will see a good solution for all players. But abandon the free choice of campaigns will eventually kill the game i think. Btw. T50 is NOT historically wrong. It fought in 1941 at Leningrad and even at Moscow. Same goes for Jumbo. It entered service in 1944. Although not at D Day, but in terms of timeline its reasonable.
I agree with him as well, this game’s target audience are the people you like to call a minority. The causals are the ones who need to get up and leave if they don’t like us criticizing the historical mistakes the devs are making.
Yes. We woukd keep all our squads, slots, and most importantly, map/campaign choices.
I keep repeating this as well. That you also say it comforts me in seeing I’m not alone thinking this way.
So when is it releasing ?
Might take months.
They simply showed us a roadmap ahead of time and what would the new system would look like.
Which is smart.
Because it means they can also correct flaws ahead of time and check with community what they think of it.
I find that refreshing tbh.
You’ve never had “complete (historical) accuracy”, so this is nonsense.
Good point