Why is mg nest 2-3 times longer deploy time than AA, please reverse deployment timings, that may mean more mg nests get build instead of cheesy AA, I also think depression of AA gun should be reduced.
Or as another post I responded too, make AA do less damage against infantry, make clouds of flak smoke appear, which will mask other troops advancing from AA gunners, flag guns should have explosive smoke not shells right?
the AA guns are in a ok place with damage
they could give us the flak 30 instead of the flak 38
they can also add that you need a full crew to use it
while i do think that yes
this is good
the rest is no so good
Full crew for fast reload, one guy on the gun will be slow reload.
considering also how easy its to destroy MG its quite meh.
So far havent had games where AA against inf would have been major issue.
But as theres already the MG nest thats supposed to do that task, why not.
And while reducing the AA guns depression they could increase the AT guns depression. Its absolute pain in the ass to build it in such manner that you can actually use it.
In cbt not many people used AA in anty infantry role.
Why people chose AA over MG:
Make MG:
Make AA:
AA should be good vs infantry. We need to introduce a better alternarive instead of nerfing it.
Comparison
AA-GUN: is faster to build,cheaper,better armored, and can kill even plane
MG-NEST: slow to build,expensive,no armor,some time cant even aim to infantry
The AA is the best one for sure, the mg-nest need a rework because now is only a filler unlock in the engi 2 squad upgrade