This is what I said. Any questions?
I ask again, What gap existed in the Allies Tunisia arsenal that required a rare, never used, automatic rifle to fill? I understand that you like the gun, that’s an opinion that doesn’t need justification, but if you’re going to complain about historical realism in a game about history, expect to get ridiculed.
i dont care about historical accuracy but apparently you do so does the person who wrote the post
I ask again, What gap existed in the Allies Tunisia arsenal that required a rare, never used, automatic rifle to fill?
what part of fun are you missing why do you feel the need to voice your opinion on every thing i say for honestly i just like the riffle so what!!! so im not allowed to like what they added cause you don’t. what’s the problem with this gun that’s got your pants in a bunch for. eventually they will add tiger all the other missing weapons so whats your problem other than its not used by anyone
this is nothing new
I’m not trying to tell you what you can or can’t like, that’s entirely your opinion and I take no issue with it. You don’t have to justify an opinion, and I haven’t asked you to.
You said this:
And I asked
This is a direct request for further information about an assertion you made, and you still haven’t answered. If that assertion is based entirely on your opinion, that’s fine, I don’t agree, and I’m sorry if that offends you. If you actually see a gap that needed to be filled in Allies Tunisia, I’d love to know where it is, because I can’t see it.
So, I ask again, What gap existed in the Allies Tunisia arsenal that required a rare, never used, automatic rifle to fill?
if u don’t see it then that’s on you
No, it isn’t. If you insist that it exists, the burden of proof is on you. That’s how arguments work.
I suppose I could provide evidence that such a gap doesn’t exist, but that’s questionable logic even when done right.
Again, if you just believe that gap exists without knowing where or why, then it’s your opinion, you’re welcome to it, and I don’t have to care.
And again, since you’ve maintained the claim so far: What gap existed in the Allies Tunisia arsenal that required a rare, never used, automatic rifle to fill?
dude if you dont like what the devs added go somewhere else but im not explaining any thing to you ill probably get flagged and then banned by the time this ends so
Right now, we’re not still talking about likes and dislikes, I’m trying to get you to back up a statement you made. Why would I flag you for supporting your arguments? You haven’t said anything remotely out of line, just arguing poorly.
I won’t ask the question again, so instead I’ll say this: You’re wrong, no gap existed in Allies Tunisia, there was no need for another automatic weapon to further improve their battle performance. Unless you answer my question, or admit that gap is just your opinion, you’ll continue to be wrong.
again your wrong the weapon will be awesome i will enjoy using it very much good day sir the dev were right to add this weapon nice addition to the collection
Tell me how
It might be, but that’s your opinion
Good for you. NGL, I might too, but that doesn’t mean I think it was necessary. The two aren’t connected for me.
^opinion
^opinion, but I can’t disagree with you here.
Good talk. Look forward to hearing your arguments supporting a gap that needed filled for Allies Tunisia.
O my fucking God allies should not have any ulterior advantages but devs dosent care
This weapon should not even be usable but devs doesn’t care
More grind more ppl buy, it’s so diffult to understand?
Arguing on something so stupid
oh you mean like the germans have now in game fg42, mg34,42, panther like how they call the difference between a bar with 20 round clip and a mg 34, 42 with a 50 round clip fair why should the Germans get another overpowered item for
The balance is broken in some aspect in every campaign so yes
Call it how you want asimmetric balance OP things i don’t fucking care
so why does this surprise you its not like its the first time they rushed an update/event
Game Is shit it doesn’t surprise me, but ppl that argue on this obvious fact yes.
Yeah, Tunisia was already imbalanced, but we’ll see if this makes the problem worse I guess.
The axis in tunisia get zero of the weapons or vehicles you just mentioned, so what do they have to do with the balance in tunisia?
Hard to say really that this is offence worthy.
They are trying to give your country a representation in this game. With a gun that most don’t know about.
Is it so hard to look at the bright side? Maybe people will google NZ and their contributions in WW2. Maybe they will google the gun and learn about it and the histories and your people.
Our knee jerk reaction to be ‘offended’ by everything or take everything in bad context is so out of hand.
Am I pissed that they have picked some wierd odd guns to use for the Axis that really have no right being in this game? Nope. It is cool to see little bits of prototype history be playable.
u act like there never coming to Tunisia it wont be unbalanced for long hopefully
I expect another 15 Thompson, garand, gewher, breda more recycled shit less work.